Biological criminology examines how genetics, neurobiology, and physiological factors influence criminal behavior, emphasizing the role of biology in crime.
Understanding Biological Criminology
Biological criminology, also known as biosocial criminology, explores the ways in which biological factors contribute to criminal behavior. While traditional criminology often focuses on environmental influences such as poverty, socialization, and peer pressure, biological criminology investigates the genetic, neurological, and physiological aspects of criminality. This perspective does not claim that biology alone determines whether someone becomes a criminal, but it does suggest that biological predispositions interact with environmental factors to shape behavior.
This field has evolved significantly over time. Early theories relied on flawed and controversial ideas, such as those proposed by Cesare Lombroso in the 19th century, which suggested that criminals could be identified by physical traits. Modern biological criminology, however, is grounded in scientific research that examines genetics, brain structure, hormonal influences, and other biological mechanisms that may contribute to criminal behavior.
Historical Foundations of Biological Criminology
The idea that biology influences crime has existed for centuries. One of the earliest figures in biological criminology was Cesare Lombroso, an Italian physician and criminologist who, in the late 1800s, argued that criminals had distinct physical features such as asymmetrical faces, large jaws, and long arms. He believed these characteristics were signs of “atavism,” or evolutionary throwbacks to primitive human ancestors. While Lombroso’s ideas were widely accepted at the time, they have since been discredited due to a lack of scientific support.
Following Lombroso, researchers in the early 20th century turned to heredity as a possible explanation for criminality. Studies on families, twins, and adopted children attempted to determine whether criminal behavior was inherited. Some studies, such as those conducted by Charles Goring in the early 1900s, suggested that criminals tended to have lower intelligence and poorer physical health, though these findings were later questioned.
By the mid-20th century, the field shifted toward examining biochemical and neurological influences on behavior. Advances in genetics, neuroscience, and psychology have since helped refine biological criminology, allowing researchers to explore how specific biological factors interact with social and environmental influences.
Genetics and Crime
One of the central questions in biological criminology is whether criminal behavior is inherited. Researchers have conducted numerous studies on twins and adopted children to explore the role of genetics in crime.
Twin studies compare identical twins (who share 100% of their genes) with fraternal twins (who share about 50%) to determine whether genetic similarities correlate with criminal behavior. Some studies have found that identical twins are more likely to share criminal tendencies than fraternal twins, suggesting a genetic component.
Adoption studies provide further insight by examining children who were adopted away from their biological parents. If a child’s biological parents had a history of criminal behavior, and the child also engages in criminal activity despite being raised in a different environment, this suggests a genetic influence. One well-known study by Sarnoff Mednick in the 1970s found that adopted children were more likely to have criminal records if their biological parents had been criminals, even when raised by non-criminal adoptive parents.
Although genetics appear to play a role in criminal behavior, they do not act in isolation. Instead, genetic predispositions interact with environmental factors, such as childhood experiences, peer influence, and socioeconomic conditions. This interaction is often referred to as the “nature versus nurture” debate, though most researchers now agree that both biological and social factors contribute to behavior.
Brain Structure and Criminal Behavior
Neuroscience has provided valuable insights into the biological basis of criminality. Studies using brain imaging technology, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans, have shown that differences in brain structure and function may contribute to antisocial and violent behavior.
One area of focus is the prefrontal cortex, the part of the brain responsible for impulse control, decision-making, and regulating emotions. Research has found that individuals with damage or abnormalities in the prefrontal cortex often struggle with self-control and may exhibit impulsive or aggressive behavior. Studies on violent criminals and individuals with antisocial personality disorder have shown reduced activity in the prefrontal cortex, which may explain their difficulty in controlling aggressive impulses.
Another brain region linked to criminal behavior is the amygdala, which plays a key role in processing emotions, particularly fear and aggression. Studies have found that individuals with smaller or underactive amygdalae are more likely to engage in aggressive or violent behavior. This suggests that some criminals may have a biological difficulty in experiencing fear or empathy, making them more prone to antisocial acts.
Neurotransmitters and Hormones in Crime
Biological criminologists also study how chemical imbalances in the brain contribute to criminal behavior. Neurotransmitters, which are chemicals that transmit signals between nerve cells, play a critical role in regulating mood, impulse control, and aggression.
One neurotransmitter commonly associated with criminal behavior is serotonin. Low levels of serotonin have been linked to increased aggression, impulsivity, and violent behavior. Studies have shown that individuals with lower serotonin levels are more likely to engage in impulsive crimes, such as assault or robbery.
Dopamine, another important neurotransmitter, is linked to the brain’s reward system. High dopamine levels can contribute to sensation-seeking behavior, which may increase the likelihood of engaging in risky or criminal activities. However, the relationship between dopamine and crime is complex, as it also plays a role in motivation and goal-directed behavior.
Hormones, particularly testosterone and cortisol, have also been studied in relation to crime. Testosterone, the hormone associated with aggression and dominance, has been linked to violent behavior. Some studies suggest that individuals with higher levels of testosterone are more likely to exhibit aggressive tendencies. Conversely, cortisol, which is associated with stress regulation, may influence criminal behavior as well. Low cortisol levels have been linked to a reduced fear response, which could make individuals more likely to engage in risky or antisocial behavior without considering the consequences.
The Interaction Between Biology and Environment
While biological factors play a role in criminal behavior, they do not operate in isolation. Most researchers agree that crime results from an interaction between biology and environment. Individuals with genetic or neurological predispositions may be more susceptible to engaging in criminal behavior, but environmental factors such as childhood experiences, peer influence, and socioeconomic conditions shape whether those predispositions manifest.
For example, a child with a genetic predisposition to impulsivity may not become a criminal if raised in a supportive and structured environment. Conversely, the same child in a neglectful or abusive household may be more likely to engage in delinquency. This concept is known as the diathesis-stress model, which suggests that individuals with biological vulnerabilities are more likely to develop behavioral problems when exposed to stressors or adverse environments.
Implications for Criminal Justice
Biological criminology has important implications for the criminal justice system. Understanding the biological underpinnings of criminal behavior can help in developing more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies. For instance, recognizing that impulse control issues may have a neurological basis can inform treatment approaches, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy or medication that targets specific neurotransmitters.
Additionally, brain imaging and genetic testing could potentially be used in risk assessments to identify individuals who may be more prone to violent behavior. However, this raises ethical concerns about privacy, stigmatization, and the potential for misuse of biological data in legal proceedings.
Conclusion
Biological criminology provides valuable insights into the factors that contribute to criminal behavior. By examining genetics, brain function, neurotransmitters, and hormonal influences, researchers can better understand why some individuals are more prone to crime than others. However, biology does not act in isolation—social and environmental influences play an equally critical role. The integration of biological and environmental perspectives allows for a more comprehensive understanding of criminal behavior, ultimately informing more effective prevention and rehabilitation strategies in the criminal justice system.
[ Glossary ]
Last Modified: 02/22/2025