California v. Greenwood (1988) | Definition

Doc's CJ Glossary by Adam J. McKee
Course: Introduction / Procedural Law

California v. Greenwood (1988) is a SCOTUS decision that established the rule that police do not need a warrant to search garbage left outside the curtilage of the home.

In California v. Greenwood (1988), the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures does not extend to the contents of garbage bags left for collection outside the curtilage of a home. The case began when police received a tip that Billy Greenwood was selling drugs from his residence. The police searched the garbage bags that Greenwood left on the street outside his home and found evidence of drug use. Greenwood argued that the warrantless search of his garbage violated his Fourth Amendment rights, but the Court disagreed.

The Court reasoned that the expectation of privacy in garbage left outside the curtilage of the home is diminished, as it is readily accessible to the public. The Court emphasized that Greenwood had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his discarded garbage because it had been left outside for collection. The Court further held that the fact that the garbage bags were located on the curbside did not render them part of the home’s curtilage, as the curtilage is the area immediately surrounding and associated with the home, where privacy expectations are most heightened.

The decision in California v. Greenwood had significant implications for law enforcement, as it provided a new avenue for collecting evidence without a warrant. Law enforcement agencies have since relied on the ruling to conduct warrantless searches of garbage, both at the state and federal levels. The ruling has been praised by proponents of law and order as a necessary tool for law enforcement to investigate and prosecute criminal activity. However, critics of the ruling argue that it undermines Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures and that it opens the door for police to conduct invasive searches of personal belongings without a warrant.

The decision in California v. Greenwood also highlighted the tension between privacy and law enforcement interests. While the Court acknowledged that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their homes and personal effects, it also recognized that the government has a legitimate interest in investigating and preventing criminal activity. The case underscores the ongoing debate over the proper balance between individual privacy and law enforcement interests in the criminal justice system.

Learn More

On This Site

On Other Sites

[ Glossary ]

Last Modified: 04/08/2023

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.