Cornish and Clarke developed the Rational Choice Theory in criminology, which argues that offenders make conscious decisions to commit crimes based on perceived risks and rewards.
Introduction to Cornish and Clarke’s Rational Choice Theory
Derek Cornish and Ronald Clarke introduced Rational Choice Theory (RCT) in criminology during the 1980s. Their work challenged earlier theories that focused primarily on social and psychological causes of crime. Instead, they proposed that criminals make rational decisions before offending, weighing the potential benefits against the possible risks. This theory became a cornerstone of modern crime prevention strategies, particularly situational crime prevention.
Background of Cornish and Clarke
Derek Cornish
Derek Cornish is a criminologist known for his work on offender decision-making. His research has emphasized how criminals adapt their behaviors based on circumstances. Cornish has collaborated extensively with Ronald Clarke to refine theories about rationality in criminal choices.
Ronald Clarke
Ronald Clarke is one of the leading figures in situational crime prevention. He has contributed significantly to criminological theory by focusing on practical ways to reduce opportunities for crime. Clarke’s research has shaped policies worldwide, influencing law enforcement and urban planning strategies.
The Core Principles of Rational Choice Theory
Cornish and Clarke’s Rational Choice Theory rests on several key ideas:
- Crime is a deliberate choice – Criminals assess risks and rewards before acting.
- Decisions vary by crime type – Different crimes require different levels of planning and rationality.
- Offenders respond to environmental factors – Changes in security measures or legal consequences influence decisions.
- Criminals seek to maximize rewards while minimizing risks – If the risk of getting caught is too high, they may choose not to offend.
Routine Activity Theory and Its Connection
Rational Choice Theory aligns with Routine Activity Theory, developed by Lawrence Cohen and Marcus Felson. Routine Activity Theory suggests that crime occurs when three elements converge: a motivated offender, a suitable target, and the absence of capable guardianship. Cornish and Clarke’s ideas build on this by explaining how offenders make decisions based on these conditions.
Bounded Rationality and Criminal Decision-Making
Cornish and Clarke acknowledged that offenders do not always have perfect information when making choices. They introduced the concept of bounded rationality, meaning criminals make decisions within constraints such as time, intelligence, and available information. This idea explains why some crimes appear impulsive while others involve careful planning.
Two Types of Decision-Making
Cornish and Clarke identified two levels of decision-making in crime:
- Initial Involvement Decisions – The offender decides whether to engage in crime based on personal background, needs, and opportunities.
- Crime Event Decisions – Once an offender chooses to commit a crime, they make decisions about execution, such as selecting a target or planning an escape.
Practical Applications in Crime Prevention
Cornish and Clarke’s Rational Choice Theory has influenced crime prevention strategies, particularly situational crime prevention (SCP). This approach focuses on reducing opportunities for crime through environmental changes.
Techniques of Situational Crime Prevention
Clarke developed 25 situational crime prevention techniques to deter criminal behavior. These techniques fall into five categories:
- Increase the effort required to commit a crime – Examples include installing locks, security cameras, and fences.
- Increase the risks of committing crime – Measures such as police patrols, neighborhood watch programs, and improved lighting can deter offenders.
- Reduce rewards from crime – Strategies like marking property, reducing cash on hand in businesses, or using anti-theft devices discourage theft.
- Reduce provocations that lead to crime – This includes measures like managing crowds at events or designing public spaces to minimize conflicts.
- Remove excuses for crime – Signs, alarms, and clear rules help prevent rationalizations for criminal behavior.
Criticisms of Rational Choice Theory
While Rational Choice Theory has been influential, it has faced criticism from criminologists who argue that not all crimes are rationally planned. Critics suggest that:
- Many crimes are impulsive – Some offenses, such as crimes of passion, occur without prior calculation.
- Social and psychological factors matter – Economic conditions, mental health, and peer influences can override rational decision-making.
- Overemphasis on deterrence – Some argue that increasing risks does not always stop crime, especially for habitual offenders.
Influence on Modern Criminal Justice Policies
Despite criticisms, Rational Choice Theory has shaped modern criminal justice policies. Law enforcement agencies use its principles in crime mapping, predictive policing, and crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED). Retail stores apply the theory by using anti-theft measures, while urban planners design spaces to minimize criminal opportunities.
Conclusion
Cornish and Clarke’s Rational Choice Theory transformed criminology by emphasizing offender decision-making. Their work has provided valuable insights into how criminals weigh risks and rewards, leading to effective crime prevention strategies. While not without limitations, their ideas continue to influence criminal justice policies worldwide.
[ Glossary ]
Last Modified: 02/23/2025