The dichotomy of deviance in criminology refers to the distinction between positive and negative deviance, where one challenges social norms for progress and the other disrupts society.
Understanding the Concept of Deviance
Deviance refers to behaviors, actions, or thoughts that violate social norms. These norms are the expected rules of behavior within a society or group. Deviance is not inherently good or bad; it is simply any action that strays from what is considered “normal.”
Criminologists study deviance to understand why individuals break rules, how society reacts, and the consequences of such behaviors. Some deviant actions lead to criminal penalties, while others may bring social change. The dichotomy of deviance helps distinguish between the types of deviance that harm society and those that challenge norms in a way that can lead to progress.
The Two Sides of Deviance
The term “dichotomy of deviance” refers to the division between positive deviance and negative deviance. These two forms represent opposite effects of norm-breaking behaviors.
Positive Deviance
Positive deviance occurs when individuals or groups challenge norms in a way that benefits society. These people may be seen as unusual or disruptive at first, but their actions lead to social improvements.
Examples of Positive Deviance:
- Civil Rights Leaders – Activists like Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks engaged in nonviolent protests that defied discriminatory laws but ultimately contributed to social progress.
- Whistleblowers – People like Edward Snowden or Daniel Ellsberg revealed government misconduct. While controversial, their actions raised awareness of privacy and governmental accountability.
- Scientific Innovators – Scientists who challenge widely accepted theories often face criticism before their ideas gain acceptance. Figures like Galileo and Darwin changed the course of history through their nonconformity.
Positive deviants often face resistance because they question the status quo. However, over time, their ideas or actions may reshape societal norms in beneficial ways.
Negative Deviance
Negative deviance, on the other hand, refers to behaviors that violate norms in a harmful or disruptive manner. These actions are typically associated with crime, immorality, or unethical conduct.
Examples of Negative Deviance:
- Violent Crime – Murder, assault, and other violent acts directly harm individuals and society.
- Theft and Fraud – Stealing from others or engaging in fraudulent activities disrupts economic stability and social trust.
- Substance Abuse – Drug addiction and illegal drug trade contribute to health crises and crime.
- White-Collar Crime – Financial crimes such as embezzlement, insider trading, and corruption damage economic systems and social trust.
Unlike positive deviance, negative deviance is widely condemned and often leads to legal consequences. Criminal justice systems exist largely to address negative deviance through law enforcement, courts, and corrections.
Theories Supporting the Dichotomy of Deviance
Several criminological theories help explain the dichotomy of deviance and why individuals engage in norm-breaking behaviors.
Merton’s Strain Theory
Sociologist Robert K. Merton (1938) developed Strain Theory to explain how individuals respond to the pressures of achieving success in society. According to Merton, societies establish culturally approved goals, such as wealth, education, or career advancement, and also dictate acceptable ways to achieve them. However, not everyone has equal access to these legitimate means. When people face obstacles—such as poverty, discrimination, or lack of educational opportunities—they experience strain, or frustration, because they cannot reach these goals through socially acceptable paths.
Merton identified five ways individuals adapt to this strain. The most common response is conformity, where individuals accept both societal goals and the approved methods to achieve them, even if success is difficult. Some, however, turn to innovation, where they accept the goal but use unconventional or illegal means—such as theft, fraud, or drug dealing—to attain it. Others engage in ritualism, rigidly following rules and routines despite losing sight of the ultimate goal. In contrast, retreatists reject both the goals and the means, often withdrawing from society through substance abuse or homelessness. Finally, rebels reject existing goals and means entirely, seeking to replace them with new values, often driving social change.
Merton’s theory provides insight into both negative deviance, where individuals turn to crime due to blocked opportunities, and positive deviance, where reformers and revolutionaries reject existing norms to advocate for change. This framework remains influential in criminology, helping to explain why some people commit crimes while others challenge norms in constructive ways.
Becker’s Labeling Theory
Howard Becker (1963) introduced Labeling Theory, which suggests that deviance is not inherent in any act but is determined by society’s reaction. When society labels someone as deviant, they may embrace that identity and continue their behavior.
Labeling plays a role in both positive and negative deviance. Activists and reformers often face labels such as “troublemakers” before gaining recognition. Criminals, on the other hand, may accept their deviant identity, reinforcing negative behaviors.
Durkheim’s Perspective on Deviance
French sociologist Émile Durkheim (1895) viewed deviance as an essential part of society, arguing that it serves important functions rather than being purely negative. He believed that deviance helps define moral boundaries by clarifying what behaviors are acceptable and unacceptable. When society reacts to deviant acts, it reinforces shared values and norms, helping to maintain social order. Without deviance, moral guidelines would become unclear, making it difficult for individuals to understand what is expected of them.
Durkheim also argued that deviance strengthens social unity by bringing people together in response to norm violations. When a crime or moral transgression occurs, members of society collectively reaffirm their commitment to social norms, creating a sense of solidarity. For example, public outrage over corruption or violent crime can unite people in demanding justice and reinforcing ethical standards.
Beyond reinforcing social norms, Durkheim saw deviance as a driver of social progress. He believed that certain forms of norm-breaking behavior challenge outdated or unjust societal rules, leading to necessary change. Many social movements, such as those for civil rights or gender equality, began as deviant behaviors that later reshaped laws and cultural values. While excessive crime and lawlessness threaten stability, Durkheim emphasized that some level of deviance is not only natural but also beneficial.
His perspective aligns with the dichotomy of deviance, recognizing that norm-breaking behavior can either strengthen society by reinforcing norms or harm it when it becomes destructive.
The Role of Social Control in Deviance
Societies use social control to manage deviant behavior. Social control mechanisms can be formal, such as laws and law enforcement, or informal, such as peer pressure and social norms.
- Formal Social Control – The criminal justice system enforces laws and punishes negative deviance.
- Informal Social Control – Families, schools, and communities shape behavior by rewarding conformity and discouraging deviance.
While negative deviance is often suppressed, positive deviance may also face resistance. Social movements and change agents frequently encounter opposition before their ideas gain acceptance.
The Impact of Deviance on Criminal Justice
The criminal justice system plays a crucial role in managing deviance by distinguishing between behaviors that threaten social order and those that challenge outdated norms. Law enforcement agencies, courts, and correctional institutions primarily work to reduce negative deviance, such as violent crime, fraud, or drug trafficking, by enforcing laws and imposing penalties. However, a key challenge in criminal justice is recognizing that not all deviant behavior is harmful. Some forms of deviance—particularly those that question unfair laws or promote social progress—may ultimately lead to legal and cultural change.
One difficulty in regulating deviance is that laws and societal norms evolve over time. Behaviors once considered criminal may later become widely accepted, while previously tolerated actions may become punishable offenses. A historical example is Prohibition (1920-1933) in the United States, when alcohol consumption was outlawed. While intended to reduce crime and moral corruption, Prohibition led to illegal bootlegging and organized crime. Public resistance and unintended consequences eventually led to its repeal.
Similarly, marijuana legalization demonstrates how societal views shift. Once classified as a dangerous drug, marijuana has been decriminalized or legalized in many jurisdictions due to changing public opinion and medical research.
Another example is civil disobedience, where individuals deliberately break laws to protest injustice. Many historical figures—such as Martin Luther King Jr. and Mahatma Gandhi—were arrested for acts of resistance that later led to legal and societal advancements. These cases highlight the complexity of deviance, showing that the criminal justice system must balance enforcing laws with recognizing the potential for positive social change.
Conclusion
The dichotomy of deviance highlights the complex relationship between norm-breaking behavior and social change. Positive deviance challenges outdated norms, leading to progress, while negative deviance disrupts society in harmful ways. Understanding this distinction helps criminologists, policymakers, and law enforcement develop fair and effective responses to deviance.
[ Glossary ]
Last Modified: 02/24/2025