Leviathan, written by Thomas Hobbes in 1651, argues that a strong central authority is necessary to prevent chaos and crime, shaping criminological thought on social control.
Leviathan and Its Importance in Criminology
Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan is one of the most influential political works in Western philosophy. It lays the foundation for modern ideas about government, law, and social order. Hobbes wrote the book in the aftermath of the English Civil War, a time of political instability and violence. In Leviathan, he argues that without a strong government, society would descend into anarchy, where life would be “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”
Hobbes’ ideas about human nature and governance have had a lasting impact on criminology. His work helps explain why laws exist, why people obey them, and how governments prevent crime. Criminologists use his theories to understand the role of the state in maintaining order and controlling deviant behavior.
The Social Contract and Crime Prevention
Hobbes’ Leviathan introduces the idea of the social contract. He believed that people are naturally selfish and driven by self-interest. In a state of nature, without laws or government, people would constantly fight for survival. To escape this chaos, individuals agree to form a society and give up some of their freedoms in exchange for security and protection. This agreement, or social contract, is enforced by a sovereign authority, which Hobbes called the Leviathan.
How the Social Contract Relates to Crime
Hobbes’ view of human nature suggests that people would commit crimes if there were no consequences. Laws exist to prevent crime by establishing clear rules and punishments. The government enforces these laws to maintain order. From a criminological perspective, Hobbes’ ideas support the concept of deterrence—the belief that people obey laws because they fear punishment.
Authority and Social Control
In Leviathan, Hobbes argues that only a powerful government can maintain order. He believed that a single ruler or a strong central authority was necessary to enforce laws and prevent society from collapsing into disorder. This idea relates to criminology through the concept of formal social control, where institutions like the police, courts, and prisons work to regulate behavior and prevent crime.
Hobbes’ Influence on Criminological Theories
Hobbes’ ideas have influenced several criminological theories, particularly those related to social control, deterrence, and rational choice.
Social Control Theory
Social control theory, developed by Travis Hirschi in the 1960s, builds on Hobbes’ idea that people need strong institutions to prevent them from committing crimes. Hirschi argued that individuals are less likely to break the law when they have strong bonds to society, such as relationships with family, school, and community. These bonds act as informal social controls that discourage criminal behavior.
Deterrence Theory
Deterrence theory is based on the idea that people choose to commit crimes when the benefits outweigh the risks. Hobbes’ belief that laws and punishments are necessary to prevent chaos aligns with this theory. Modern deterrence theory, which has influenced criminal justice policies, suggests that swift, certain, and severe punishments can discourage criminal activity.
Rational Choice Theory
Rational choice theory, developed in the late 20th century, also reflects Hobbes’ views on human nature. This theory suggests that individuals weigh the costs and benefits before deciding to commit a crime. If the risks are too high, they will likely choose not to break the law. Hobbes’ Leviathan supports the idea that strong laws and punishments help deter crime by making criminal activity less appealing.
Criticism of Hobbes’ Views on Crime and Government
While Hobbes’ ideas have influenced criminology, they have also faced criticism. Some scholars argue that his view of human nature is too pessimistic. Not all people commit crimes when given the chance, and not all governments are effective at preventing crime.
Overemphasis on State Control
Hobbes believed that an all-powerful government was necessary to maintain order, but critics argue that too much state control can lead to oppression. In modern democracies, there is a balance between enforcing laws and protecting individual freedoms. Some criminologists emphasize the role of community-based solutions, such as rehabilitation and restorative justice, rather than relying solely on strict punishments.
Lack of Focus on Social Inequality
Hobbes did not address how social inequality and economic conditions contribute to crime. Modern criminologists recognize that factors like poverty, lack of education, and discrimination play a significant role in criminal behavior. While Hobbes focused on the need for strong laws, many criminologists argue that addressing social issues can also reduce crime.
Hobbes’ Legacy in Criminal Justice Today
Despite criticisms, Hobbes’ ideas continue to shape modern criminal justice policies. His emphasis on deterrence is seen in strict sentencing laws, such as mandatory minimum sentences and three-strikes laws. His belief in strong government control is reflected in policies that expand police powers and surveillance.
However, modern criminal justice systems also recognize the importance of balancing punishment with rehabilitation and fairness. While Hobbes focused on preventing crime through fear, today’s criminologists explore multiple approaches, including crime prevention programs, social reforms, and restorative justice practices.
Conclusion
Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan remains a foundational text in political philosophy and criminology. His ideas about human nature, the social contract, and the role of government help explain why laws exist and how they prevent crime. While his emphasis on strong state control and deterrence has influenced criminal justice policies, modern criminology also considers other factors, such as social conditions and rehabilitation. Despite its limitations, Leviathan provides valuable insights into the relationship between law, authority, and crime prevention.
[ Glossary ]
Last Modified: 03/02/2025