Michael Gottfredson is a criminologist best known for co-developing the General Theory of Crime, which links low self-control to criminal behavior.
Introduction to Michael Gottfredson
Michael R. Gottfredson is a distinguished criminologist whose work has significantly influenced the field of criminal justice. He is best known for co-authoring the General Theory of Crime with Travis Hirschi in 1990. This theory argues that low self-control is the primary cause of criminal behavior. Gottfredson’s research has shaped how scholars, law enforcement professionals, and policymakers understand crime and its prevention.
Beyond criminological theory, Gottfredson has contributed to studies on victimization, juvenile delinquency, and the effectiveness of criminal justice policies. His work emphasizes empirical research and real-world applications, making his theories relevant to both academics and practitioners.
The General Theory of Crime
The General Theory of Crime, also called the Self-Control Theory of Crime, is one of the most influential criminological theories. In their book A General Theory of Crime (1990), Gottfredson and Hirschi argue that crime stems from an individual’s level of self-control. According to this theory, people with low self-control are more likely to engage in impulsive, risky, and criminal behaviors.
Key Principles of the General Theory of Crime
Low Self-Control Causes Crime
Gottfredson and Hirschi argue that low self-control is the primary cause of criminal behavior. Individuals with low self-control tend to act impulsively, seeking immediate gratification without considering long-term consequences. According to the General Theory of Crime, people with low self-control are more likely to engage in reckless, risk-taking behaviors, including criminal activity. They often lack patience, persistence, and the ability to delay gratification, making them more prone to acts that provide instant rewards, such as theft, fraud, or violent outbursts. These individuals struggle to weigh the risks of getting caught or the potential harm they may cause to others. Because they focus on immediate pleasure rather than future repercussions, they often engage in repeated criminal behavior despite past punishments. This principle suggests that crime prevention should focus on fostering self-control in individuals rather than solely relying on external deterrents like law enforcement or harsher sentencing.
Self-Control Develops in Childhood
Gottfredson and Hirschi emphasize that self-control is largely shaped during early childhood. They argue that parenting plays a crucial role in a child’s ability to regulate impulses and make thoughtful decisions. According to their theory, children develop self-control through consistent discipline, supervision, and emotional support from caregivers. Parents who fail to monitor their children’s behavior, discipline them effectively, or teach them patience and responsibility may inadvertently raise individuals prone to criminal behavior. If a child does not learn self-discipline early, they are unlikely to develop it later in life, making them more susceptible to impulsive and antisocial actions. This perspective highlights the importance of early childhood interventions, such as parenting programs, structured education, and mentoring, in reducing future criminal tendencies. By ensuring that children learn self-regulation skills from an early age, society can help prevent crime before it begins.
Crime is Simple and Immediate
A central tenet of the General Theory of Crime is that criminal acts are often simple, easy to commit, and provide immediate gratification. Gottfredson and Hirschi argue that most crimes do not require extensive planning or advanced skills. For example, stealing an unattended wallet, vandalizing property, or engaging in physical assault often requires little effort but provides quick rewards, such as financial gain or a sense of power. Individuals with low self-control are drawn to these acts because they seek immediate satisfaction rather than considering the potential long-term consequences, such as arrest, imprisonment, or social stigma. The theory suggests that since crime is inherently opportunistic, reducing opportunities for impulsive crimes—through surveillance, stricter regulations, or environmental design—can help lower crime rates. This principle also explains why many criminals repeatedly offend; they prioritize short-term gratification over learning from past mistakes.
Self-Control Affects All Aspects of Life
While the General Theory of Crime primarily focuses on criminal behavior, Gottfredson and Hirschi argue that self-control influences many other aspects of life. Individuals with low self-control are not only more likely to commit crimes but also to struggle with academic achievement, maintain unstable employment, engage in substance abuse, and have problematic relationships. Their inability to delay gratification and make responsible long-term decisions often results in poor financial management, job instability, and difficulty maintaining healthy personal relationships. For example, someone with low self-control may impulsively drop out of school rather than invest in their education, leading to fewer job opportunities and a higher likelihood of engaging in criminal activity to support themselves. Similarly, they may engage in risky behaviors such as gambling, reckless driving, or drug use, which further contribute to personal and social instability. This principle suggests that improving self-control through education, counseling, and structured social programs can not only prevent crime but also lead to overall better life outcomes.
By understanding these key principles, criminal justice professionals, policymakers, and educators can develop more effective strategies for crime prevention. The General Theory of Crime underscores the importance of early intervention and self-control development as long-term solutions to reducing criminal behavior.
Implications for Criminal Justice
Gottfredson and Hirschi’s theory has had a major impact on crime prevention and law enforcement strategies. Since self-control is largely shaped during childhood, policies focusing on early intervention, such as parental training programs and youth mentoring, have been emphasized as crime prevention methods.
Additionally, the theory suggests that traditional deterrence-based approaches, like harsher punishments, may not be as effective because individuals with low self-control do not consider future consequences. Instead, strategies that emphasize long-term behavioral changes, such as rehabilitation and education, may be more successful.
Contributions to Victimology
Beyond criminological theory, Gottfredson has contributed to victimology, the study of crime victims and their experiences. His research has examined how lifestyle choices and personal behaviors influence the likelihood of victimization.
Gottfredson’s work in this area aligns with routine activity theory, which suggests that crime occurs when three elements converge: a motivated offender, a suitable target, and the absence of capable guardianship. He has explored how individuals can reduce their risk of victimization by altering their behaviors and environments.
Research on Juvenile Delinquency
Gottfredson has also studied juvenile delinquency, focusing on the effectiveness of early intervention programs. He has emphasized that addressing risk factors, such as poor parenting, lack of supervision, and school failure, can help prevent youth from engaging in criminal behavior.
His research supports community-based programs that provide positive role models, education, and structured activities for at-risk youth. These initiatives align with his broader belief that crime prevention should start in childhood by fostering self-control and social responsibility.
Criticism and Debate
While the General Theory of Crime has been widely accepted as a major contribution to criminology, it has also faced significant criticism. One of the most common critiques is that self-control alone cannot fully explain criminal behavior. Many criminologists argue that crime is a complex phenomenon influenced by multiple factors beyond just personality traits. For example, social structures such as poverty, neighborhood conditions, and educational opportunities play a crucial role in shaping an individual’s likelihood of engaging in criminal activity. Critics contend that the theory downplays the impact of external influences, such as peer pressure and community environment, which have been shown to contribute significantly to criminal behavior. Sociological theories, such as Robert Merton’s Strain Theory and Edwin Sutherland’s Differential Association Theory, emphasize how social conditions and learned behaviors shape crime, offering alternative explanations that contradict the idea that self-control is the primary factor in criminality. By focusing almost exclusively on self-control, the General Theory of Crime may overlook broader social and economic issues that contribute to criminal behavior.
Another major point of contention is the theory’s claim that self-control is primarily formed in early childhood and remains relatively stable throughout life. While Gottfredson and Hirschi argue that inadequate parenting leads to low self-control, some researchers believe that self-control can change over time. Studies in psychology and neuroscience suggest that individuals can develop better self-regulation skills through life experiences, education, therapy, and rehabilitation programs. For example, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and structured educational programs have been shown to improve impulse control in both juveniles and adults. Research on neuroplasticity—the brain’s ability to change and adapt—also challenges the idea that self-control is fixed after childhood. If self-control can be developed or improved later in life, as some evidence suggests, then crime prevention efforts could benefit from interventions aimed at adolescents and adults, rather than focusing solely on early childhood development. This perspective contradicts the rigid developmental claims made by the General Theory of Crime and suggests that there may be more flexibility in shaping an individual’s propensity for crime than the theory acknowledges.
Despite these criticisms, Gottfredson and Hirschi’s work remains foundational in criminology, and many modern theories build upon or modify their ideas. While some scholars reject the notion that low self-control is the sole cause of crime, many recognize its role as an important contributing factor. In response to criticisms, some researchers have attempted to integrate self-control theory with other criminological perspectives, creating hybrid models that account for both individual traits and social influences. For example, some scholars have suggested combining self-control theory with elements of routine activity theory to better explain why certain individuals commit crimes in specific situations. Additionally, policymakers and practitioners continue to apply the theory’s insights in crime prevention programs, particularly those focused on early childhood intervention. Although the General Theory of Crime may not explain all aspects of criminal behavior, its emphasis on self-regulation has had a lasting influence on both academic research and practical approaches to reducing crime.
Legacy and Influence
Michael Gottfredson’s contributions to criminology have had a lasting impact on both academic research and practical crime prevention strategies. His emphasis on self-control as a key factor in criminal behavior has shaped policies that focus on early intervention and education.
His work continues to influence criminologists, policymakers, and law enforcement professionals seeking effective ways to reduce crime. By highlighting the importance of childhood development in shaping future behavior, Gottfredson has provided valuable insights into how society can prevent criminal activity before it begins.
Conclusion
Michael Gottfredson is a leading figure in criminology, best known for co-developing the General Theory of Crime. His research has shaped the understanding of crime causation, victimization, and juvenile delinquency. While his theories have sparked debate, they remain influential in criminal justice policy and crime prevention efforts.
[ Glossary ]
Last Modified: 03/02/2025