Ranking scales are survey tools that ask respondents to place items in order of preference or importance, helping researchers compare priorities.
What Are Ranking Scales in Surveys?
In social science research, ranking scales are a type of survey question that asks participants to rank a list of items from most preferred to least preferred or most important to least important. This helps researchers understand how people prioritize different choices, ideas, or experiences.
For example, in a public policy survey, participants might be asked to rank the importance of issues like healthcare, education, the economy, and climate change. A person who ranks climate change as 1 and the economy as 4 is saying that, to them, addressing climate change is the top priority.
Ranking scales are different from rating scales. While rating scales ask people to score each item independently (such as giving everything a score from 1 to 5), ranking forces respondents to compare items directly. This makes ranking scales especially useful when researchers want to understand preferences or decision-making processes.
Why Ranking Scales Matter in Research
They Reveal Relative Importance
Ranking scales help identify which items people value the most or the least. This is especially helpful when resources are limited and researchers or policymakers must decide what to focus on.
They Force Choices
Because participants must put one item above another, they can’t rate everything equally. This is helpful in reducing the problem of central tendency bias, where people rate all items as “neutral” or “important” without distinction.
They Support Clear Comparisons
Rankings allow researchers to compare not just how important each item is, but how items stack up against one another. This creates rich data that can show priorities across individuals or groups.
They Are Easy to Understand
Most people are familiar with the idea of ordering items by preference. That makes ranking questions simple to answer and easy to explain.
How Ranking Scales Work in Surveys
Ranking scales present a list of options and ask the respondent to arrange them in a specific order. The most common formats include:
- Numerical rankings: Respondents write numbers next to each option (1 = most important).
- Drag-and-drop interfaces: In online surveys, participants move items into order using their mouse or finger.
- Dropdown lists or grids: In digital formats, participants select ranking positions from menus or tables.
Researchers must give clear instructions, such as:
“Please rank the following items from 1 (most important) to 5 (least important). Use each number only once.”
Survey tools like Qualtrics, SurveyMonkey, and Google Forms support ranking questions, often with built-in validation to prevent duplicate rankings.
Examples of Ranking Scales in Social Science Fields
Sociology Example
A sociologist studying life values may ask participants to rank items like family, career, religion, leisure, and community service. The responses can show generational or cultural differences in values.
Psychology Example
A psychologist exploring coping strategies might have people rank approaches like talking to a friend, exercising, journaling, or avoiding problems. The ranked data reveals preferred coping styles.
Political Science Example
A political scientist may ask voters to rank campaign issues—such as taxes, healthcare, immigration, and education—to see which ones drive electoral decisions.
Education Example
Students in a university feedback survey might be asked to rank aspects of course satisfaction, such as instructor clarity, workload, resources, and grading fairness.
Criminal Justice Example
A criminologist researching justice reform might ask citizens to rank proposed changes like reducing sentences, increasing rehabilitation, hiring more officers, or expanding community programs.
Strengths of Ranking Scales
Prioritization Is Clear
Ranking scales provide a clear picture of which items are most important to respondents. This helps researchers and decision-makers allocate time, money, or attention effectively.
No Duplicate Ratings
Unlike rating scales, rankings don’t allow respondents to give equal scores to multiple items. This makes analysis sharper by forcing respondents to choose which item truly matters more.
Useful for Small Sets of Options
When the number of options is manageable (usually 5 to 7 items), ranking scales can be very effective and quick to complete.
Easy to Analyze with Descriptive Statistics
Researchers can calculate how often each item was ranked first, second, third, and so on. This produces frequency distributions and average rankings that make comparisons simple.
Limitations of Ranking Scales
Cognitive Load Increases with More Items
As the number of items increases, it becomes harder for respondents to rank them accurately. Most researchers recommend using no more than 7 items in a ranking scale to keep it manageable.
No Information About Gaps Between Rankings
Ranking tells us the order of preferences but not the strength of preference. For example, a person may slightly prefer item A over B, but strongly prefer both over item C. The rankings (1, 2, 3) don’t capture that intensity.
No Ties Allowed
In a traditional ranking scale, each number can be used only once. This forces respondents to make artificial choices in cases where they truly value two items equally.
Harder to Analyze Than Ratings for Some Purposes
Because ranking data is ordinal (not interval or ratio), researchers must use specific non-parametric statistical tests. Rankings can’t be analyzed the same way as average scores or percentages.
How Researchers Analyze Ranking Scale Data
Frequency Counts
They count how many times each item was ranked first, second, and so on. This shows which items were top choices overall.
Average Rank
Each item’s average rank is calculated by summing its rank positions across all respondents and dividing by the number of people. The item with the lowest average rank is considered the most preferred.
Rank-Order Correlation
Statistical methods like Spearman’s rho or Kendall’s tau can measure the similarity of rankings between individuals or between groups.
Cross-Tabulations
Researchers can compare rankings across demographic groups (like age or gender) to see if different groups prioritize items differently.
Best Practices for Designing Ranking Scale Questions
- Limit the number of items to 5–7 for better accuracy and lower burden.
- Give clear instructions and explain how to rank without duplicates.
- Pretest your questions to make sure participants understand what each item means.
- Avoid mixing ranking with rating on the same set of items to prevent confusion.
- Ensure response validation in online forms to avoid missing or duplicated rankings.
When to Use Ranking Scales
Use ranking scales when your research question focuses on comparative preferences rather than standalone evaluations. They work well when:
- You want to know which of several policies people value most.
- You’re comparing features or benefits of a service or product.
- You need a clearer picture than rating scales can offer.
Ranking scales are commonly used in needs assessments, policy research, consumer surveys, program evaluation, and market research within social sciences.
Alternatives to Ranking Scales
Depending on your goals, you might also consider:
- Rating scales: Measure how much people like or agree with each item individually.
- Forced-choice questions: Ask people to pick one option from a small set.
- Paired comparisons: Ask respondents to choose between two items at a time.
These methods can sometimes capture strength of preference or reduce the effort required to complete a question, especially with long lists.
Final Thoughts
Ranking scales are a powerful survey tool that help social science researchers learn how people compare and prioritize options. While they have some limits—like not capturing intensity or allowing ties—they provide clear, structured insights into decision-making and preferences. When designed thoughtfully and analyzed correctly, ranking scales are an excellent way to dig into what really matters to participants.
Glossary Return to Doc's Research Glossary
Last Modified: 03/22/2025