The raw score is the original, unadjusted score a participant earns on a test or measure before any transformations, such as scaling or standardization, occur.
What Is a Raw Score in Social Science Research?
In social science research, a raw score refers to the initial, unprocessed result a person receives on a test, questionnaire, or other form of measurement. It is the actual number of points, correct answers, or selected responses that a participant earns, before any adjustments, conversions, or comparisons are made.
For example, if a student answers 17 questions correctly out of 25 on a survey measuring civic knowledge, their raw score is 17. This score has not been converted to a percentage, percentile rank, z-score, or any other standardized form.
Raw scores are the foundation of quantitative analysis in many fields, including psychology, sociology, education, and political science. Researchers collect raw scores from surveys, cognitive tests, attitude scales, behavioral observations, and other tools. Once collected, these scores can be analyzed directly or transformed into other formats for deeper interpretation.
Why Raw Scores Matter in Research
They Represent the Starting Point
Raw scores are the first form of data researchers receive from participants. They represent each individual’s direct performance or response before the data is adjusted or interpreted. Without raw scores, researchers would have no basis for further statistical analysis.
They Allow for Transparency
Reporting raw scores supports research transparency. Other researchers can see how data was originally collected and how it was later transformed. This helps maintain ethical standards and improves the trustworthiness of the findings.
They Are Used to Create Standard Scores
Many research studies convert raw scores into standardized forms to allow for comparison. For example, researchers might transform raw scores into z-scores, T-scores, or percentile ranks to show how individuals compare to others.
They Are Useful for Item-Level Analysis
Raw scores are helpful when researchers want to look at item-level patterns. For example, they might analyze which test questions were most frequently missed or which Likert-scale items were most commonly endorsed.
Raw Score vs. Standard Score
Understanding the difference between raw scores and standard scores is essential in social science research.
- Raw score: The original number or response recorded.
- Standard score: A score that has been transformed based on a formula, often to account for the mean and standard deviation of a larger group.
Example:
A student scores 42 on a psychology scale. That’s the raw score. If researchers standardize the scale so that the mean is 50 and the standard deviation is 10, that same score might convert to a standard score of 45. This allows researchers to interpret how far above or below average the student scored.
How Raw Scores Are Collected
Researchers gather raw scores in various ways depending on the type of study:
Surveys
Respondents select answers to items on questionnaires. For instance, if a political science survey has 10 multiple-choice questions about voting behavior, a raw score might represent how many correct answers a participant provided.
Rating Scales
In psychological or sociological scales, respondents rate items on a scale (such as 1 to 5). A raw score might be the sum of item responses across a full scale.
Cognitive and Academic Tests
Education researchers may use standardized tests, and the raw score would be the number of correct answers out of the total number of questions.
Behavioral Observations
In fieldwork or observational studies, raw scores can represent how many times a behavior was observed in a certain time period (e.g., number of aggressive acts in a classroom over 30 minutes).
Examples from Social Science Research
Sociology Example
A sociologist studying community involvement gives participants a 15-item questionnaire. Each item is scored from 0 to 4. The raw score is the sum of all item responses, ranging from 0 to 60.
Psychology Example
A clinical psychologist administers a depression inventory where each item is rated from 0 to 3. The raw score helps determine symptom severity before any clinical interpretation or categorization.
Education Example
An education researcher gives a math test with 50 questions. A student’s raw score of 40 means they answered 40 questions correctly. This may later be converted into a percentage or scaled score.
Political Science Example
A researcher collects responses to 10 factual questions about political institutions. A participant’s raw score of 8 means they answered 8 correctly. This can be used to measure political knowledge.
Criminology Example
A criminologist observes peer interactions among incarcerated youth. Each time a participant initiates a prosocial behavior, it is recorded. The total number is the raw score for that behavior in the observation period.
Strengths of Using Raw Scores
Simple and Direct
Raw scores reflect exactly what was measured with no manipulation. They are easy to understand and easy to calculate.
Flexible for Analysis
Researchers can use raw scores in multiple ways—on their own or as the basis for transformations. They provide the data needed for more advanced statistics.
Allow Item-Level Evaluation
Researchers can go back to the raw scores to evaluate specific items or test questions, helping improve survey or test design in future studies.
Reproducible
Other researchers can recalculate analyses from raw scores, which supports reproducibility and transparency.
Limitations of Raw Scores
Not Comparable Across Groups
Raw scores can’t always be meaningfully compared across different populations, tests, or conditions. For example, a raw score of 25 may mean different things depending on the difficulty of the test or characteristics of the group.
Lack of Context
Raw scores don’t tell you where a participant stands relative to others. Without transformation, it’s hard to know whether a score is high, low, or average.
Sensitive to Test Length
A longer test will often produce higher raw scores simply because there are more items. This makes it hard to compare raw scores between tests of different lengths.
Can Be Misleading Without Scaling
If a test is very easy or very hard, raw scores may bunch together at the top or bottom, which limits their usefulness in distinguishing between participants.
Best Practices for Using Raw Scores
- Always define what the raw score represents. Indicate whether it’s a count of correct answers, a sum of Likert items, or a frequency of behaviors.
- Use transformations when needed. Convert raw scores to percentages, standard scores, or scaled scores when comparison is necessary.
- Report raw scores in addition to other scores. This improves transparency and allows for replication.
- Avoid overinterpreting raw scores alone. Always consider context, group differences, and instrument design.
- Use descriptive statistics. When analyzing raw scores, calculate means, medians, standard deviations, and ranges to describe the data.
How Raw Scores Are Used in Analysis
Descriptive Statistics
Researchers often begin by calculating the mean, median, and standard deviation of raw scores. This gives an overview of how participants performed on a measure.
Standardization
Raw scores are often transformed into z-scores or percentile ranks so researchers can compare scores across individuals or samples.
Cutoff Scores
In applied research, raw scores may be used to determine whether someone meets a diagnostic threshold, such as scoring above 50 on a scale of anxiety.
Group Comparisons
Researchers may use raw scores to compare performance between different groups, such as males vs. females or treatment vs. control groups, using t-tests or ANOVA.
When to Use Raw Scores
Use raw scores when:
- You are conducting item-level analysis or test evaluation.
- You want to examine patterns before standardization.
- You need to report original outcomes from participants.
- You are conducting pilot testing or scale development.
- You are analyzing data within a single, consistent group where standardization is unnecessary.
Final Thoughts
Raw scores are the essential starting point for most quantitative research in the social sciences. Whether from a test, a scale, or an observation, raw scores capture each participant’s original response in its purest form. While they may lack context or comparability on their own, they are flexible, transparent, and foundational to many types of analysis. Social scientists use raw scores to calculate group averages, analyze specific items, develop new instruments, and transform results for broader comparisons. When interpreted correctly, raw scores provide a direct window into participant behavior, knowledge, or attitudes.
Glossary Return to Doc's Research Glossary
Last Modified: 03/23/2025