Synthesis of the literature refers to the process of combining findings from multiple sources to create a cohesive understanding of a research topic.
What Is Synthesis of the Literature?
In social science research, synthesis of the literature is the step where researchers move beyond simply describing what other studies say. Instead, they compare, connect, and combine ideas from different sources to create a broader understanding of a topic. This is a critical part of writing a literature review, where the goal is not just to summarize past research, but to build a meaningful conversation around it.
Synthesis involves identifying patterns, similarities, differences, gaps, and disagreements among studies. Instead of listing study after study, researchers group ideas together, showing how they relate or contrast. This helps create a foundation for new research by highlighting what is already known and what still needs to be explored.
Good synthesis helps readers understand where a field of study stands and what questions are still open. It also supports stronger research design by linking current work to what has been previously done.
How Synthesis Differs from Summary
Summary: Telling What Each Study Says
A summary explains the main ideas or findings of a single source. For example, you might write, “Jones (2019) found that teacher feedback improves student motivation.” That sentence summarizes one study.
Synthesis: Connecting Multiple Studies
Synthesis brings together several studies and shows how they relate. For example, you might write, “Several studies (Jones, 2019; Patel, 2020; Lee, 2021) have shown that timely feedback increases student motivation, particularly when the feedback is specific and delivered by trusted instructors.”
In this example, you are not just reporting results—you are combining them to support a larger idea. Synthesis helps build a new insight by putting sources in conversation with each other.
Why Synthesis Is Important in Research
Helps Build a Clearer Picture
No single study can answer every question. By combining the results of many studies, synthesis creates a more complete and balanced view of a topic. It shows what findings are widely agreed on, what results are conflicting, and where evidence is still lacking.
Supports Critical Thinking
Synthesis encourages researchers to think deeply about the material. Instead of accepting each source at face value, researchers analyze how ideas connect or clash. This strengthens the reasoning behind a research question or argument.
Leads to Better Research Questions
By identifying gaps or inconsistencies in the literature, synthesis helps researchers find important questions to explore. It also helps justify why a new study is needed and how it contributes to the field.
Strengthens Literature Reviews
Synthesis is the heart of a strong literature review. A well-synthesized review flows smoothly and shows how the field has developed over time. It makes clear what is known, what is debated, and what still needs to be studied.
Steps in Synthesizing the Literature
Step 1: Collect and Read the Sources
Begin by gathering peer-reviewed articles, books, reports, or other reliable sources related to your research topic. Read each one carefully to understand the key findings, methods, and conclusions.
Take notes on:
- Research questions or goals
- Sample sizes and populations
- Theories or frameworks used
- Main findings or arguments
- Limitations
Step 2: Identify Key Themes and Patterns
Look across the sources for ideas that come up repeatedly. These might include:
- Similar findings
- Shared theories
- Contrasting results
- Methodological trends
- Gaps or missing perspectives
Group sources into themes or categories based on these patterns. For example, if you’re studying school discipline, you might group sources into those that focus on race, teacher bias, student behavior, or policy reform.
Step 3: Compare and Contrast Studies
Ask critical questions about how the sources relate to one another:
- Do they agree or disagree?
- Do they use the same methods?
- Are there patterns based on geography, population, or time period?
- What assumptions do the authors make?
This comparison is where synthesis begins. It’s not about listing findings but analyzing how they fit together.
Step 4: Organize the Information Logically
Once you’ve grouped your sources and identified relationships, organize your writing so that the connections are clear. Avoid writing one paragraph per study. Instead, structure each paragraph around a theme or idea, and bring in multiple sources to support it.
Each paragraph might look like this:
- Introduce the theme or idea
- Explain how several studies relate to it
- Point out agreements, disagreements, or gaps
- Conclude with a summary or question that leads to the next point
Step 5: Use Your Own Voice
Even though you’re writing about other people’s research, the synthesis should reflect your understanding. Use your own words to describe relationships among studies. Avoid simply quoting source after source. Instead, paraphrase and interpret the ideas in a way that supports your argument or research focus.
Step 6: Connect to Your Research Question
Throughout the synthesis, keep your research question or goal in mind. Show how the existing literature leads naturally to your study. Highlight where your research fits in, what it adds, or how it addresses a gap.
Strategies for Effective Synthesis
- Use comparative language: Words like “similarly,” “in contrast,” and “however” show how studies relate.
- Focus on themes, not authors: Group ideas rather than discussing one source per paragraph.
- Keep it focused and relevant: Include only sources that directly support your review’s purpose.
- Maintain academic tone: Use clear, formal language and avoid casual or emotional phrasing.
Examples from Social Science Fields
Sociology
“Research consistently shows that parental income strongly influences children’s educational attainment (Johnson, 2017; Lopez, 2018). However, recent work highlights the role of school quality in either amplifying or reducing these effects (Patel, 2021; Grant, 2022), suggesting that education policy may play a larger role than previously believed.”
Psychology
“Studies have linked early childhood play to improved executive functioning (Chen, 2020; Rivera, 2021). While most research focuses on unstructured play, some evidence points to structured games as equally beneficial in certain contexts (Zhao, 2022).”
Education
“Numerous studies support the use of formative assessment to improve student performance (Turner, 2019; Garcia, 2020). Yet, the impact appears to vary based on teacher training and student age, indicating that implementation practices are a critical factor (Nguyen, 2021; Bell, 2022).”
Political Science
“While most scholars agree that media exposure influences political attitudes (Smith, 2018; Khan, 2019), there is disagreement about which types of media have the strongest effects. Some argue that traditional news remains most influential (Lee, 2020), while others find that social media now plays a central role (Ahmed, 2021).”
Criminology
“Research on community policing has shown mixed results. Some studies report improved trust in law enforcement (Davis, 2019; Monroe, 2020), while others find no measurable impact on crime rates (Blake, 2021; Silva, 2022). The variation may be due to differences in program implementation across cities.”
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Listing sources one by one without making connections
- Summarizing without analyzing how studies relate
- Overusing direct quotes instead of paraphrasing
- Focusing too much on one source and ignoring others
- Losing sight of the research question
Conclusion
Synthesis of the literature is one of the most important skills in social science research writing. It turns a collection of studies into a meaningful, organized review that shows what is known and where new research can contribute. A strong synthesis connects ideas, highlights gaps, and supports the development of a research question or argument.
Rather than simply summarizing sources, synthesis puts them into conversation. It shows how studies fit together and points the way forward for research. By practicing synthesis, social science researchers sharpen their thinking, improve their writing, and make more meaningful contributions to their fields.
Glossary Return to Doc's Research Glossary
Last Modified: 03/29/2025