Confrontation Clause | Definition

Doc's CJ Glossary by Adam J. McKee

The Confrontation Clause is a clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution that guarantees that in all criminal prosecutions, the accused has the right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses who are giving evidence against them.


The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution is a crucial protection afforded to individuals accused of a crime. This clause guarantees that in all criminal prosecutions, the accused has the right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses who are giving evidence against them.

The Confrontation Clause is rooted in the English common law tradition, which recognized the importance of a defendant being able to challenge the evidence presented against them. In the United States, the clause was included in the Sixth Amendment as a response to the abuses of power by the British during the colonial period, where individuals were often convicted based on hearsay evidence or evidence provided by anonymous witnesses.

The clause ensures that a defendant has the opportunity to challenge the credibility and reliability of the evidence against them by cross-examining the witnesses who are providing testimony. This right is critical because it allows the defendant to test the accuracy and truthfulness of the evidence presented by the prosecution and to expose any biases, inconsistencies, or lies.

There are some exceptions to the Confrontation Clause. For example, if a witness is unavailable to testify in court due to death, illness, or other factors, the prosecution may be permitted to introduce prior testimony given by the witness under certain circumstances. Additionally, the Supreme Court has recognized that in some cases, such as in cases involving child witnesses or domestic violence victims, strict application of the Confrontation Clause may be impractical or harmful.

The Confrontation Clause has been the subject of much litigation and interpretation over the years. The Supreme Court has established several rules and standards for how the clause should be applied, including the requirement that the witness must be subject to cross-examination, that hearsay evidence is generally inadmissible, and that the defendant must be given a fair opportunity to confront and challenge the witnesses against them.


Learn More

On This Site


[ Glossary ]

Last Modified: 04/18/2023

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.