barrier | Campus Safe Words

TERM: barrier
RISK LEVEL: Moderate

Why It’s Risky

The term “barrier” is often used in DEI and access-related discussions to imply that institutions or systems are structurally unfair or exclusionary. In conservative-governed states, such framing is increasingly scrutinized under laws like Florida’s Stop W.O.K.E. Act and Texas Senate Bill 17, which discourage language suggesting systemic bias or institutional fault. When used without clear, neutral context—particularly in policy proposals, grant writing, or student services—”barrier” may be interpreted as ideological, signaling an activist or equity-centered agenda.

Common Critiques

Critics argue that “barrier” language often implies institutional culpability and is rooted in frameworks that assume unequal outcomes are the result of systemic oppression. This assumption is seen as promoting DEI ideology and undermining merit-based standards. The term can also be viewed as vague or emotionally loaded, particularly when describing social or historical challenges without empirical justification.

When It’s Still Appropriate

“Barrier” may be appropriate when referring to clearly defined obstacles such as lack of internet access, physical inaccessibility, or scheduling conflicts. It is also acceptable in research contexts when supported by data (e.g., “transportation barriers to student attendance”). When used in these ways, the term should be framed objectively and with a specific causal explanation, avoiding ideological framing.

Suggested Substitutes

1. Challenge (for general academic or logistical issues)

2. Obstacle (when describing tangible or practical difficulties)

3. Limiting factor (in research or policy analysis)

4. Constraint (for institutional or procedural issues)

5. Access issue (when describing a neutral, solvable problem)

Notes:
Avoid using “barrier” in promotional materials, program goals, or mission statements without concrete, measurable context. When appropriate, pair with data or logistical explanations rather than identity-based claims. In politically sensitive environments, clarify that the term refers to solvable problems, not systemic indictments.