belong | Campus Safe Words

TERM: belong
RISK LEVEL: High

Why It’s Risky

The term “belong” is frequently used in DEI frameworks to promote emotional inclusion and identity affirmation, especially in relation to race, gender identity, or other protected categories. Conservative-backed legislation such as Florida’s Stop W.O.K.E. Act and Texas Senate Bill 17 discourages institutional messaging that implies students’ value or acceptance depends on identity-based recognition. Using “belong” in mission statements, program goals, or training materials may be viewed as ideological and subject to legislative or administrative pushback.

Common Critiques

Critics argue that institutional efforts to promote “belonging” often shift focus from academic rigor to emotional validation. The term is seen as subjective, difficult to measure, and tied to progressive efforts to reshape campus culture around identity politics. Some also view “belonging” language as implicitly accusing institutions of systemic exclusion, which can be politically contentious and interpreted as undermining traditional values or personal responsibility.

When It’s Still Appropriate

“Belong” may be appropriate when quoting scholarly literature, analyzing student retention theories, or citing findings related to campus climate in sociology or education research. It can also be used in qualitative assessments where students describe their own experiences. In these cases, the term should be framed analytically and distinguished from institutional commitments or mandates.

Suggested Substitutes

1. Feel welcomed (in general community-building contexts)

2. Positive student experience (for administrative or strategic planning)

3. Supportive environment (for describing services or culture)

4. Engaged community (in retention or campus life discussions)

5. Student connection (in surveys or program evaluations)

Notes:
Avoid using “belong” in institutional goals, staff expectations, or policy frameworks without clear context and justification. When necessary, clarify that the term reflects student perceptions, not mandated institutional values. Use more neutral, measurable alternatives in official documents to maintain compliance with current state-level restrictions.