biologically male | Campus Safe Words

TERM: biologically male
RISK LEVEL: Moderate

Why It’s Risky

“Biologically male” is typically used to describe individuals based on anatomical or chromosomal sex and is increasingly central to legal definitions in conservative-led states. Legislation such as Florida’s Stop W.O.K.E. Act and various state-level policies related to sports, facilities access, and healthcare now rely on biological sex as a legal standard. While the term aligns with state-preferred language and is unlikely to draw political scrutiny from the right, it may be seen as exclusionary or dismissive of gender identity by students, staff, or faculty aligned with DEI principles. The risk is thus more reputational than legal.

Common Critiques

Critics argue that “biologically male” conflates sex and gender, reinforcing binary thinking and undermining the lived experiences of transgender or nonbinary individuals. It may be perceived as insensitive or politically charged in academic or campus life contexts, especially when used without reference to gender identity. In inclusive environments, the term can be interpreted as signaling resistance to evolving norms in language and identity recognition.

When It’s Still Appropriate

“Biologically male” is appropriate in legal, medical, and athletic contexts where distinctions based on physical sex characteristics are relevant and supported by statute or regulation. It is also suitable in scientific or health-related disciplines when discussing sex-linked traits, conditions, or data. When used, it should be clearly tied to the specific needs of the discussion and not as a blanket descriptor for identity.

Suggested Substitutes

1. Male (when context already implies biological reference)

2. Sex-based classification: male (in legal or policy contexts)

3. Male at birth (for neutral demographic reporting)

4. Anatomical male (in clinical or health discussions)

5. Documented sex: male (in administrative or compliance settings)

Notes:
Use “biologically male” only when the distinction is directly relevant and supported by disciplinary or legal context. In classroom or campus settings where gender identity is a central concern, clarify the purpose of the term to avoid misinterpretation. While politically defensible under current state laws, its use may still be challenged in DEI-focused environments; pairing with neutral, factual framing helps mitigate reputational risk.