clean energy | Campus Safe Words

TERM: clean energy
RISK LEVEL: Moderate

Why It’s Risky

The term “clean energy” is widely used in environmental science, policy, and engineering but can be politically sensitive depending on framing. In conservative-led states, policies tied to ESG (environmental, social, and governance) initiatives or federal climate agendas have come under scrutiny. When “clean energy” is used to promote policy shifts, institutional investment changes, or advocacy-related programming, it may be viewed as ideologically aligned with progressive environmental activism rather than neutral scientific instruction or research.

Common Critiques

Critics argue that “clean energy” is a politically loaded term that implicitly casts traditional energy sources—like coal, oil, and natural gas—as dirty or unethical. Legislators have raised concerns that the term is used to advance climate-focused mandates, push divestment from fossil fuels, or promote federal policies not aligned with state interests. In some cases, “clean energy” is seen as a marker for ESG compliance, which has become a target in efforts to keep politics out of public institutions.

When It’s Still Appropriate

“Clean energy” is appropriate in engineering, environmental science, and economics when referring to energy sources with low environmental impact, such as solar, wind, hydro, and nuclear. It may also be used in grant proposals, research, or course descriptions when clearly tied to technical or policy analysis. In these cases, the term should be grounded in data, peer-reviewed literature, or regulatory frameworks.

Suggested Substitutes

1. Low-emission energy sources (in scientific or regulatory contexts)

2. Renewable energy (when discussing solar, wind, hydro, etc.)

3. Non-carbon-based energy (for technical discussions)

4. Alternative energy (for general education or policy references)

5. Environmentally sustainable energy (used with caution and clarity)

Notes:
Avoid using “clean energy” in mission statements, campus-wide initiatives, or investment language without a clear academic or technical foundation. When used, pair the term with specific technologies or outcomes rather than advocacy language. Clarify whether the usage refers to engineering performance, emissions data, or regulatory classification to maintain neutrality and avoid politicization.