climate crisis | Campus Safe Words

TERM: climate crisis
RISK LEVEL: High

Why It’s Risky

The term “climate crisis” is often used to convey urgency and moral weight in discussions about environmental policy, sustainability, and global warming. However, in states with legislation or executive directives targeting ESG frameworks and perceived political messaging, such as Florida Executive Order 22-276 or Texas’s anti-ESG laws, this phrase is flagged as ideologically charged. Public institutions using “climate crisis” in official materials may be viewed as promoting advocacy rather than scientific inquiry, which can invite scrutiny from lawmakers or boards of regents.

Common Critiques

Critics argue that “climate crisis” reflects alarmist rhetoric rather than neutral analysis and implies a political consensus that excludes dissenting views. Some see the term as a call to action for progressive environmental reforms, such as emissions mandates, energy transitions, or fossil fuel divestment—policies often opposed by conservative leaders. Its use in education or research is sometimes interpreted as advancing activism over objective study.

When It’s Still Appropriate

“Climate crisis” may be appropriate in courses or publications analyzing rhetoric, environmental communication, or policy debates, provided it is clearly framed as a term under discussion. Faculty may also reference it when quoting official reports (e.g., IPCC) or analyzing language used in media or international agreements. In all cases, it should be presented as one of multiple frameworks rather than a campus-endorsed narrative.

Suggested Substitutes

1. Climate change (in scientific or general contexts)

2. Global warming (for temperature-specific trends)

3. Environmental challenges (in broad discussions)

4. Climate-related risks (in policy or planning contexts)

5. Shifts in global climate systems (for technical discussions)

Notes:
Avoid using “climate crisis” in mission statements, campus initiatives, or public-facing content unless directly quoting a source or analyzing its usage. In politically sensitive environments, opt for neutral, descriptive terminology that reflects data without signaling urgency or ideology. When necessary, clarify that the term is part of scholarly or policy discourse, not institutional messaging.