climate science | Campus Safe Words

TERM: climate science
RISK LEVEL: Moderate

Why It’s Risky

“Climate science” is a legitimate academic discipline, but its public presentation can become politically sensitive, especially in conservative-governed states where skepticism of climate-related policy and research funding is common. Under executive actions and legislative trends such as Florida Executive Order 22-276 and Texas’s opposition to ESG-aligned education, references to “climate science” may be viewed with suspicion if tied to activism, funding advocacy, or curriculum perceived as one-sided.

Common Critiques

Critics argue that “climate science” is sometimes used as a rhetorical shield for ideological positions, particularly in cases where dissenting views on environmental policy are minimized or excluded. Some view the term as a gateway to promoting controversial initiatives such as fossil fuel divestment, carbon taxes, or mandated curricular content. There is also concern that climate science is sometimes presented in ways that blur the line between education and advocacy.

When It’s Still Appropriate

“Climate science” is fully appropriate in academic programs, research, and instruction when clearly grounded in physical sciences such as meteorology, geology, oceanography, or atmospheric chemistry. It may also be used in grant applications, peer-reviewed publications, and course descriptions where the term reflects established scientific methods and frameworks, rather than policy outcomes.

Suggested Substitutes

1. Atmospheric science (for physical and data-driven research)

2. Earth systems science (for interdisciplinary studies)

3. Environmental science (in general education contexts)

4. Climate research (for specific projects or findings)

5. Study of climate systems (in curriculum or outreach materials)

Notes:
Use “climate science” with clear academic or disciplinary framing, especially in public materials or funding requests. Avoid pairing the term with advocacy-oriented language or political claims about urgency or responsibility unless citing external sources. In politically sensitive states, clarify that instruction focuses on scientific methods, evidence evaluation, and environmental data rather than promoting specific policy positions.