cultural differences | Campus Safe Words

TERM: cultural differences
RISK LEVEL: Moderate

Why It’s Risky

The phrase “cultural differences” is generally seen as neutral, but it can become politically sensitive when used to support DEI programming, identity-based grouping, or curriculum that emphasizes systemic inequity. In conservative-led states, legislation such as Florida’s Stop W.O.K.E. Act and Texas Senate Bill 17 discourages institutional language that may be interpreted as promoting relativism, group-based moral claims, or value systems seen as inconsistent with traditional American principles. The risk increases when “cultural differences” is linked to moral critique or used to explain disparities in a way that suggests institutional blame.

Common Critiques

Critics argue that invoking “cultural differences” can obscure individual responsibility or merit and sometimes serves as a gateway to broader DEI frameworks. The phrase may be seen as encouraging group identity over shared civic values or national cohesion. In some cases, it is criticized for being used to justify exceptions, accommodations, or policies that are not applied equally.

When It’s Still Appropriate

“Cultural differences” is appropriate in language instruction, anthropology, history, communication studies, and international relations when used descriptively to explore values, customs, or traditions. It can also be used in public health and education to explain behavioral or engagement patterns, provided it is supported by research and framed without moral judgment.

Suggested Substitutes

1. Cross-cultural variation (in research or international studies)

2. Differences in tradition or custom (in humanities or historical analysis)

3. Global perspectives (in curriculum or study abroad programs)

4. Regional practices (in applied policy or communication contexts)

5. Diverse viewpoints (when discussing dialogue or discussion-based learning)

Notes:
Use “cultural differences” with academic specificity and avoid pairing it with advocacy language unless clearly grounded in disciplinary standards. When discussing disparities, focus on observable behaviors or practices rather than group identity claims. In politically sensitive environments, clarify that the term is used descriptively to support understanding, not to promote institutional reform or ideological conclusions.