diverse | Campus Safe Words

TERM: diverse
RISK LEVEL: high

Definition

“Diverse” refers to the presence of individuals from a range of different backgrounds, identities, or perspectives. In higher education, it is commonly used to describe student bodies, faculty hires, course content, or campus initiatives that reflect variation in race, ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, nationality, or ideology.

Why It’s Risky

While often viewed as a positive or neutral term, “diverse” has become politically sensitive in many states where identity-conscious policies are under scrutiny. Legislation such as Texas Senate Bill 17 and Florida’s Stop W.O.K.E. Act restrict or eliminate programs perceived to prioritize diversity over merit or to advance political or ideological goals. Critics argue that the term is frequently used to justify hiring practices, admissions decisions, or curriculum changes based on demographic targets rather than qualifications or academic standards. When “diverse” appears in job postings, institutional values statements, or strategic plans, it may trigger questions about whether the institution is complying with state laws on viewpoint neutrality, equal treatment, and non-discrimination.

Common Critiques

Opponents contend that “diverse” is often used imprecisely to signal ideological preferences rather than objective institutional goals. In hiring or admissions, the term may be interpreted as a euphemism for racial or gender quotas, raising legal concerns under state and federal equal protection laws. Some lawmakers argue that emphasizing demographic diversity risks overlooking individual achievement, undermining confidence in institutional fairness. In curriculum or training, “diverse perspectives” is sometimes criticized for prioritizing political or identity-based narratives that lack balance or academic rigor. When applied to faculty or leadership searches, the pursuit of a “diverse candidate pool” can be viewed as code for filtering applicants based on group identity, rather than qualifications or experience. In politically conservative settings, the word “diverse” may be perceived as tied to controversial DEI frameworks, increasing the risk of reputational damage or administrative intervention.

Suggested Substitutes

Broad representation (in student recruitment or public reporting)
Wide range of experiences (in classroom or program descriptions)
Inclusive participation (in co-curricular or civic engagement programs)
Cross-background collaboration (in team-building or research initiatives)
Varied perspectives (in academic discussions or general education goals)

These options retain the original intent while avoiding politically charged language.

When It May Still Be Appropriate

“Diverse” may still be used in federal grant proposals, accreditation documentation, or scholarly writing when clearly defined and supported by evidence. It may also be appropriate when quoting institutional demographics or when used in a disciplinary context such as literature, sociology, or global studies. Use with care in outward-facing materials in states with DEI restrictions or executive directives.

NOTES: Avoid using “diverse” as a catch-all goal or virtue signal without specific context. Emphasize individual qualifications, academic mission, and inclusive access. If the term is used, define what it means in measurable, non-political terms to reduce risk of misinterpretation.