elderly | Campus Safe Words

TERM: elderly
RISK LEVEL: moderate

Definition

“Elderly” is a term commonly used to describe older adults, typically those aged 65 and older. In higher education, it may appear in gerontology programs, public health research, community outreach, or continuing education initiatives.

Why It’s Risky

While the term is widely understood, “elderly” is increasingly viewed as outdated or potentially ageist in tone, particularly when used in general communication or service descriptions. Critics argue that it can imply frailty, dependence, or diminished capacity, which may contribute to negative stereotypes about aging. In politically conservative contexts, the primary risk arises not from ideological objections but from legal or reputational concerns tied to perceived insensitivity, especially in federally funded programs or public-facing language. Additionally, recent federal guidance and institutional best practices encourage more neutral alternatives that emphasize person-first, respectful terminology. When used without qualification, “elderly” may raise compliance flags in grant applications, accessibility audits, or age discrimination reviews under the Age Discrimination Act or the ADEA.

Common Critiques

Age-related advocacy groups and some policymakers argue that “elderly” reinforces outdated views of aging, framing older adults as a homogeneous group defined primarily by limitation. In campus communications or academic settings, its use may be seen as incompatible with inclusive language principles. While not as politically fraught as DEI-related terms, “elderly” can still invite criticism or correction in grant proposals, health equity research, or public service messaging. Critics also note that the term may obscure differences in ability, background, and social roles among older populations—especially as Americans remain active well into their 70s and 80s. In community partnerships or service-learning programs, using “elderly” without additional context may give the impression of condescension or a lack of awareness of respectful norms. Although conservative critics are less likely to challenge the term on ideological grounds, its unqualified use may still weaken credibility with funders, accreditation bodies, or professional organizations.

Suggested Substitutes

Older adults (in healthcare, research, or education settings)
Adults aged 65 and over (in grants, policy, or compliance language)
Aging population (in public health or demographic studies)
Retirees and seniors (in lifelong learning or service programs)
Community elders (in intergenerational or civic engagement contexts)

These alternatives are neutral, respectful, and widely accepted across political and professional settings.

When It May Still Be Appropriate

“Elderly” may still be appropriate in historical references, legal documents, or direct quotations where the term appears in statute or cited literature. It may also be acceptable when used with clarity and precision in medical or emergency contexts (e.g., “elderly fall risk” in clinical triage). However, for grant writing, outreach, and academic communications, a more respectful alternative is generally preferred.

NOTES: Always consider audience and setting when referring to age-related groups. Where possible, pair age references with context (e.g., “active older adults” or “individuals receiving Medicare”) to avoid stereotypes. In campus materials or reports, default to people-first phrasing that emphasizes dignity, ability, and active participation.