expression | Campus Safe Words

TERM: expression
RISK LEVEL: moderate

Definition

“Expression” refers to the act of conveying thoughts, beliefs, emotions, or identity through speech, writing, art, appearance, or conduct. In higher education, the term appears in discussions of academic freedom, student rights, campus policies, and identity-related discourse, including gender expression and cultural expression.

Why It’s Risky

While “expression” is broadly protected under the First Amendment and widely used in academic contexts, it can become politically sensitive when used to support or mandate recognition of controversial identity-based claims. In particular, terms like “gender expression” or “cultural expression” have come under scrutiny in states with laws limiting DEI programming or regulating content tied to gender identity, race, or ideology. Under laws like Florida’s Stop W.O.K.E. Act and Arkansas Act 1002, public institutions are restricted from endorsing or requiring certain viewpoints under the guise of expression. When “expression” is used in training mandates, syllabus requirements, or employee policy, it may be seen as compelling ideological affirmation or promoting contested definitions of identity.

Common Critiques

Critics generally support freedom of expression but object to institutional policies that appear to favor or enforce specific types of expression—especially when tied to identity. For example, in policies addressing gender expression, conservative lawmakers have argued that institutions may compel acceptance of contested gender categories in violation of free speech rights. Similarly, critics of campus activism argue that calls for “inclusive expression” sometimes result in the suppression of dissenting views. In faculty evaluations, course content guidelines, or residence life programming, the term “expression” may draw scrutiny if it appears tied to ideological enforcement or DEI-based behavioral standards. In states with active free speech legislation or anti-DEI laws, the risk increases when “expression” is framed as a protected or privileged form of identity rather than a legal right shared equally.

Suggested Substitutes

Freedom of speech (in student conduct or academic freedom policy)
Personal communication or presentation (in classroom or HR contexts)
Artistic or academic output (in creative programs or scholarly work)
Individual perspective (in classroom discussion or campus dialogue)
Civic engagement or public discourse (in student affairs or programming)

These alternatives focus on protected expression without implying institutional endorsement of identity-based frameworks.

When It May Still Be Appropriate

“Expression” is appropriate in First Amendment discussions, legal documents, and academic contexts where it is clearly linked to constitutionally protected rights. It is also acceptable in disciplinary language (e.g., literary studies, media studies) when the term is clearly defined. In general communications or policy language, use with care if the context involves gender, race, or political identity.

NOTES: When referencing “expression,” clarify whether the term refers to legally protected speech or institutionally promoted identity. Avoid policies or messaging that suggest mandated affirmation of expressive forms tied to contested identities. Emphasize free inquiry, academic dialogue, and respectful disagreement to preserve institutional neutrality and legal defensibility.