historically | Campus Safe Words

TERM: historically
RISK LEVEL: high

Definition

“Historically” is an adverb used to reference past events, patterns, or conditions. In higher education, the term frequently appears in phrases such as “historically underrepresented,” “historically excluded,” or “historically marginalized,” particularly in DEI statements, curriculum design, grant narratives, and outreach materials.

Why It’s Risky

Although neutral in structure, “historically” is politically sensitive when used to frame identity-based disparities, especially in contexts that imply institutional blame or advocate for corrective treatment. In states with laws restricting DEI language—such as Florida’s Stop W.O.K.E. Act or Texas Senate Bill 17—terms like “historically excluded” or “historically marginalized” are interpreted as ideological, suggesting systemic injustice or collective guilt. Use of “historically” in this way may draw scrutiny if it serves to justify preferential hiring, race-conscious admissions, or programming that conflicts with equal treatment standards. Risk is highest when paired with identity labels or used in policy justifications.

Common Critiques

Critics argue that “historically” is often used to reframe present-day decisions through a political lens rooted in grievance or social justice ideology. In conservative policy environments, language such as “historically underrepresented” is seen as a rhetorical device to promote outcome-based preferences, affirmative action-like measures, or DEI-aligned interventions—especially when no longer tied to current legal barriers. Some lawmakers also object to its use in general education curricula, where “historically” may preface claims about systemic racism, patriarchy, or cultural oppression without presenting alternative perspectives. Critics contend that this framing shifts institutional focus from academic excellence to social reparation, creating administrative risk and reputational exposure.

Suggested Substitutes

Previously limited access (in admissions or outreach programs)
Underrepresented in past enrollment trends (in institutional research)
Limited participation over time (in STEM, faculty hiring, etc.)
Changing enrollment patterns (in program descriptions or planning)
Former barriers to entry (in historical or legal coursework)

These alternatives describe the past without signaling ideological conclusions or mandates.

When It May Still Be Appropriate

“Historically” remains appropriate in academic research, legal analysis, and history courses where the term is used with specificity and evidence. It may also appear in federal documents or legacy grant language when required. In institutional messaging, hiring documents, or strategic plans—particularly in conservative-led states—use precise substitutes that emphasize time-based change and institutional goals rather than social narratives.

NOTES: Avoid using “historically” as a justification for present-day preferences or identity-conscious policies. Anchor references in data and context, not ideology. Focus on access, participation, and mission-aligned progress to reduce exposure in politically regulated environments.