indigenous community | Campus Safe Words

TERM: indigenous community
RISK LEVEL: high

Definition

“Indigenous community” refers to groups of people who are the original inhabitants of a given region, often characterized by distinct cultural, historical, and political identities. In higher education, the term is used in land acknowledgments, diversity initiatives, course materials, and community engagement efforts to recognize and support Native American, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, and other Indigenous peoples.

Why It’s Risky

The term “indigenous community” can raise concerns under political movements critical of DEI-related language and initiatives, especially in states that have enacted laws curbing identity-based programming, such as Florida’s Stop W.O.K.E. Act and Oklahoma’s Executive Order 2023-31. While recognition of Indigenous peoples is historically grounded, critics argue that current uses of the term often align with activist frameworks that emphasize historical grievance narratives, group rights, or land reparations. When used in official documents, especially in land acknowledgments or policy statements, the term may suggest institutional alignment with political movements seen as divisive or ideological. Conservative lawmakers have expressed concern that such language shifts institutional focus away from core academic missions and into advocacy, potentially inviting legal challenges, donor backlash, or public controversy.

Common Critiques

Critics argue that referencing the “indigenous community” in institutional documents often reflects a politicized narrative that emphasizes victimhood and historical grievance over present-day educational goals. Some contend that land acknowledgments and other Indigenous-centered practices embedded in official ceremonies or publications amount to compelled speech or ideological signaling rather than neutral recognition. Lawmakers have voiced objections that such practices can perpetuate guilt narratives, foster division, and encourage claims inconsistent with property laws and state sovereignty. In politically regulated states, institutions that heavily feature “indigenous community” language without clear academic context risk scrutiny from boards, legislative audits, and public critics. Furthermore, critics argue that these practices may divert resources and attention from broader educational priorities, leading to concerns about mission drift and politicization of campus culture.

Suggested Substitutes

Respect for the cultural heritage of all communities (in event programs);
Acknowledgment of local history and diverse traditions (in campus materials);
Support for educational opportunities for underrepresented students (in grants or scholarships);
Commitment to historical scholarship and civic engagement (in mission statements);
Promotion of cultural awareness through academic study (in course descriptions)

These alternatives recognize diversity and history without signaling political alignment or advocacy positions.

When It May Still Be Appropriate

“Indigenous community” may be appropriate in research contexts, course content related to history, anthropology, or cultural studies, and when fulfilling specific federal grant requirements. It can also appear in voluntary educational programming where participation is elective and clearly tied to academic inquiry. In formal documents such as strategic plans, hiring policies, or official communications, it is advisable to frame references in neutral, historically grounded terms to minimize risk.

NOTES: Use “indigenous community” carefully in official documents; where appropriate, frame references through historical or academic lenses rather than advocacy language. Emphasize scholarship, respect for cultural heritage, and open inquiry to align with institutional missions and reduce potential for political controversy.