inequities | Campus Safe Words

TERM: inequities
RISK LEVEL: high

Definition

“Inequities” refers to unfair differences in treatment, access, or outcomes that systematically disadvantage certain groups based on race, gender, income, or other identity characteristics. In higher education, the term is often used in strategic plans, research reports, student support initiatives, and public messaging to highlight perceived disparities that require institutional response.

Why It’s Risky

“Inequities” is widely viewed as ideologically loaded, particularly in states that have passed legislation restricting DEI-related content or identity-based interventions, such as Florida’s Stop W.O.K.E. Act and Texas Senate Bill 17. Critics argue that the term implies a value judgment about fairness, often linked to progressive frameworks that view disparities as evidence of systemic injustice. When used in official documents, the term may signal support for redistributive policies or identity-conscious decision-making, which can conflict with state laws emphasizing neutrality and equal treatment. Conservative lawmakers and trustees often interpret “inequities” as a justification for unequal treatment, quotas, or activist programming—raising concerns about mission drift, compelled speech, or misuse of public funds. Institutions using the term may face legislative inquiries, budget constraints, or public criticism.

Common Critiques

Critics contend that “inequities” frames complex educational and social outcomes in a one-dimensional way, implying that all disparities are inherently unjust and must be corrected through institutional action. They argue that the term often presumes systemic bias without adequate evidence, promoting a grievance-oriented narrative that undermines personal responsibility and academic standards. In politically sensitive environments, the presence of “inequities” in strategic plans or official communications may be seen as an endorsement of controversial social theories, such as critical race theory or intersectionality. Lawmakers and oversight bodies have cited the term in efforts to ban DEI offices, defund initiatives, or revise hiring and admissions practices. Critics also warn that this framing prioritizes group identity over individual achievement and fosters division rather than unity in academic settings. The term’s use can be particularly problematic when linked to performance metrics or funding allocations.

Suggested Substitutes

Differences in student outcomes (in data reporting);
Challenges affecting underrepresented populations (in program design);
Barriers to access or achievement (in strategic documents);
Need to improve success rates for all learners (in academic planning);
Support for fairness and equal opportunity (in institutional policies)

These alternatives highlight measurable issues while maintaining a neutral tone focused on access and performance.

When It May Still Be Appropriate

“Inequities” may be appropriate in academic research, particularly in education, sociology, or public health where the term is methodologically defined and used to frame complex data. It may also be required in grant-funded projects or compliance reports that explicitly use the term. In institutional messaging, prefer neutral, results-based alternatives unless required by an external mandate.

NOTES: Use “inequities” sparingly in strategic or public-facing documents. When necessary, ground the term in evidence and tie it to institutional outcomes. Emphasize fairness, opportunity, and student achievement to remain in compliance with evolving legal standards.