intersectionality | Campus Safe Words

TERM: intersectionality
RISK LEVEL: extreme

Definition

“Intersectionality” refers to a theoretical framework developed to explore how multiple social identities—such as race, gender, class, and sexuality—overlap and compound experiences of discrimination or privilege. In higher education, it is often used in course curricula, diversity initiatives, academic research, and staff training to explain complex social dynamics and systemic inequalities.

Why It’s Risky

“Intersectionality” is heavily associated with critical race theory and broader progressive social theories, making it a target under legislation restricting DEI initiatives and identity-based frameworks, such as Florida’s Stop W.O.K.E. Act and Texas Senate Bill 17. Critics argue that intersectionality promotes divisive identity politics and frames individuals primarily through perceived group oppression. When used in official documents, training materials, or strategic plans, the term signals ideological alignment with contested social theories, raising concerns about political bias, compelled speech, and departure from academic neutrality. In politically sensitive environments, references to intersectionality can invite audits, funding cuts, legal challenges, or reputational damage, especially when appearing in job postings, student programs, or administrative policy.

Common Critiques

Critics argue that “intersectionality” fosters a worldview focused on collective grievance and victimhood rather than individual achievement, merit, or shared civic identity. They contend it encourages division by emphasizing immutable characteristics over common goals and personal responsibility. Conservative policymakers have specifically cited intersectionality as an example of ideological indoctrination, using it as a justification for anti-DEI legislation and executive actions. Additionally, opponents argue that intersectionality lacks empirical rigor outside of specialized academic fields and has been used to justify preferential treatment or to enforce conformity with progressive social values. In states with active oversight efforts, documentation featuring intersectionality has prompted investigations into hiring practices, curriculum design, and institutional funding. Many critics view its application as incompatible with the mission of public higher education to serve all students impartially.

Suggested Substitutes

Awareness of diverse student experiences (in training materials);
Understanding the impact of multiple factors on student success (in program development);
Support for individualized learning and growth (in academic support services);
Commitment to fairness and open inquiry (in institutional policies);
Recognition of varied life experiences (in student affairs programming)

These alternatives emphasize support, fairness, and educational outcomes without political or ideological signaling.

When It May Still Be Appropriate

“Intersectionality” may be appropriate in elective academic coursework, scholarly research, or conferences focused on sociology, gender studies, or law where critical frameworks are clearly defined and academically contextualized. Outside these areas, use caution, and prefer neutral language that supports inclusive education without suggesting ideological endorsement.

NOTES: Avoid using “intersectionality” in strategic plans, hiring policies, or mandatory training documents unless explicitly required by a grant or academic accreditation. Focus institutional communications on fairness, access, and educational opportunity to maintain political neutrality and legal compliance.