LGBTQ | Campus Safe Words

TERM: LGBTQ
RISK LEVEL: extreme

Definition

“LGBTQ” stands for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (or Questioning) and refers to a broad coalition of individuals whose sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression differs from traditional heterosexual or cisgender norms. In higher education, the term is commonly used in student services, nondiscrimination policies, campus life programming, and diversity initiatives.

Why It’s Risky

The term “LGBTQ” has become highly politicized in the current regulatory climate, particularly in states with legislation restricting DEI initiatives, gender identity discussions, or perceived ideological programming, such as Florida’s Stop W.O.K.E. Act and Texas Senate Bill 17. Critics argue that the use of “LGBTQ” in official communications signals ideological alignment with progressive social agendas and frames identity characteristics as central to institutional priorities. In politically sensitive environments, referencing LGBTQ identities without direct academic or health-related context can expose institutions to accusations of compelled speech, political advocacy, or deviation from core educational missions. Institutions using this term in strategic plans, hiring practices, or general campus communications may face audits, funding restrictions, leadership reviews, or reputational harm.

Common Critiques

Opponents contend that institutional emphasis on “LGBTQ” issues promotes identity politics at the expense of merit-based education and intellectual diversity. They argue that frequent or unqualified use of the term pressures students and employees to affirm contested views on sexuality, gender, and family structures, thereby infringing on religious freedoms and freedom of conscience. In politically regulated states, references to LGBTQ identities have been specifically cited in efforts to dismantle DEI offices, revise nondiscrimination policies, and eliminate identity-based programming. Critics also caution that framing services or opportunities around LGBTQ identity groups can create perceptions of favoritism, exclusion, or activism rather than mission-neutral student support. Institutions that use the term broadly, especially in official documents, risk alienating legislators, donors, and constituents who advocate for political neutrality in public education.

Suggested Substitutes

Support for all students regardless of background (in public messaging);
Commitment to equal opportunity and student well-being (in strategic plans);
Respect for individual dignity and rights (in nondiscrimination policies);
Access to confidential and inclusive support services (in health or student affairs);
Efforts to create a safe and respectful campus environment (in leadership communications)

These alternatives maintain a focus on fairness, privacy, and academic mission without ideological framing.

When It May Still Be Appropriate

“LGBTQ” may be appropriate in elective student groups, academic research, federally mandated compliance reports, and specific health services contexts where terminology is directly relevant and participation is voluntary. In general policy documents, hiring materials, and institutional messaging, use more neutral, inclusive language that aligns with mission-driven goals and legal standards.

NOTES: Avoid using “LGBTQ” broadly in official communications unless clearly required by grant, federal compliance, or academic context. Emphasize support, dignity, and educational opportunity for all students while maintaining political neutrality to minimize risk.