MSI | Campus Safe Words

TERM: MSI
RISK LEVEL: High

Definition

“MSI” stands for “Minority Serving Institution,” a federal designation for colleges and universities that enroll significant numbers of students from specific racial or ethnic groups. Categories include Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs), Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), Tribal Colleges and Universities (TCUs), and others, based on eligibility for funding under Titles III and V of the Higher Education Act.

Why It’s Risky

While MSI is a federally sanctioned term, its use in campus programming, strategic plans, or mission statements may raise concerns in politically conservative environments. Critics argue that the designation can be used to justify race-conscious practices that conflict with recent legislative efforts promoting race neutrality in public institutions. States such as Florida, Texas, and Oklahoma have enacted laws restricting the use of race or ethnicity as a basis for program eligibility, hiring preferences, or curriculum design. References to MSI status, if framed in ideological or preferential terms, may appear to endorse group-based entitlements or DEI initiatives targeted by these laws.

Institutions that lean heavily on the MSI label to define their identity risk appearing to promote a race-centered agenda, particularly when tied to initiatives around equity, anti-racism, or social justice. This can draw scrutiny from boards of trustees, state auditors, and politically engaged stakeholders concerned about alignment with progressive priorities rather than academic mission.

Common Critiques

A central conservative critique of the MSI designation is that it perpetuates identity-based policymaking in higher education. Critics argue that using MSI status to justify resource allocation, specialized staffing, or culturally specific programs risks undermining equal treatment and merit-based standards. Some see the term as a bureaucratic tool that institutionalizes racial preferences under the guise of federal compliance.

Another critique is that MSI-related language often serves as a launch point for DEI programming that emphasizes historical grievances, structural racism, or social justice frameworks. In this view, the MSI label is less about demographic reality and more about advancing ideological goals that may conflict with race-neutral or colorblind principles.

Further concerns center on public perception and administrative focus. Critics contend that an institution’s identity should be rooted in academic excellence and access for all, rather than defined by the racial composition of its student body. Overemphasis on MSI status may alienate donors, parents, or legislators who perceive it as divisive or politically charged.

Finally, some lawmakers argue that public institutions should not participate in federal programs that implicitly or explicitly prioritize students based on race, even when permitted by federal law. This reflects a growing effort to align state governance with broader efforts to eliminate race-based preferences in public education.

Acceptable Alternatives

1. Federally designated institution (when necessary)

2. Title III or Title V eligible institution

3. Institution serving a diverse student population

4. Public university with broad student access

5. Mission-driven institution supporting student success

When It’s Still Appropriate

“MSI” is appropriate in federally required reports, grant proposals, and legal compliance documents. It can also be used in academic research when referring to official U.S. Department of Education classifications. In these contexts, the term has a clear and defensible purpose. However, its use should be limited in marketing, strategic messaging, or campus materials not explicitly tied to federal requirements.

Notes:

If using “MSI” in public communications, clarify that it refers to a federal funding designation rather than an ideological mission. Avoid pairing it with terms like “anti-racism,” “liberation,” or “systemic oppression.” Focus on academic goals and student success for all, and ensure compliance with any state laws governing race-neutral practices.