Assign This Section
Reading Assignment for Section 2.4
Read the following subsection from our online textbook: Section 2.4: Search Incident to Arrest
What You Will Learn
In this section, you’ll explore the legal foundations of Search Incident to Arrest (SITA) and how it is rooted in the Fourth Amendment. You’ll learn about the specific conditions under which warrantless searches can be conducted during an arrest, focusing on officer safety and evidence preservation. Additionally, you’ll examine the scope and limitations of SITA, including its application to modern technologies and the ongoing balance between privacy rights and public safety.
Student Learning Outcomes for Section 2.4
- SLO 1: Explain the historical origins and legal foundations of Search Incident to Arrest (SITA), including its basis in the Fourth Amendment and key cases such as Chimel v. California (1969).
- SLO 2: Identify the specific conditions under which law enforcement officers can conduct a warrantless search during an arrest, focusing on officer safety and evidence preservation.
- SLO 3: Analyze the scope and limitations of SITA, including the concept of “immediate control” and exceptions such as exigent circumstances, consent searches, and inventory searches.
- SLO 4: Evaluate the impact of SITA on individual privacy rights and law enforcement practices, considering landmark cases like Arizona v. Gant (2009) and Riley v. California (2014).
- SLO 5: Assess the challenges and controversies surrounding SITA, particularly in relation to evolving technologies and the balance between constitutional protections and public safety.
[Go to the Text Section | Index]
Case Readings
2.4 Search Incident to Arrest | Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969) | Scope of Search Incident to Arrest |
United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 (1977) | Warrant Requirement for Searches of Containers |
Slide Presentations
Present from the web:
Last Updated: 01/08/2025