Dual federalism is a form of government where power is divided between The federal government and individual state governments. The concept is based on the idea that both levels of government should be able to function independently of one another within their respective spheres of authority.
In the United States, the federal government has certain powers spelled out in the Constitution, while the states have retained their own powers. These powers include anything from taxation and law enforcement to education and public health.
While the idea of dual federalism suggests that the federal and state governments should be able to operate independently of one another, the reality is more complex. Over time, the federal government has become more dominant in certain areas, particularly in criminal justice.
This means federal laws and regulations increasingly shape how criminal justice is carried out nationwide. While individual states still retain some authority in this area, they are often subject to federal oversight and regulation. This power shift has been the subject of much debate and controversy, particularly among those who believe states should have more autonomy in governing their criminal justice systems.
The Hierarchy of Laws
The United States is governed by a system that involves two separate but related entities: the federal government and individual state governments. This division of power is known as federalism and enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.
Article Six of the Constitution establishes that federal law takes precedence over state law in case of a conflict between the two. This means that if there is a conflict between a federal law and a state law, the federal law must be followed.
However, the Bill of Rights, which is the first of ten amendments to the Constitution, is designed to protect individual rights and limit the power of the federal government. These amendments set out specific rights, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press, and they are meant to ensure that the federal government does not infringe upon these rights.
Over time, the relationship between the federal government and the states has shifted. In the past, the federal government has sometimes exercised more power over the states, particularly during times of crisis, such as the Civil War. In more recent times, there has been a trend toward what is known as cooperative federalism, where the states and the federal government work together to address common challenges.
This is particularly true in the criminal justice system, where federal laws and the criminal codes of individual states intersect. For example, federal law sets out certain crimes that are illegal across the country, such as drug trafficking and money laundering. However, each state also has its own criminal laws and procedures used to enforce these laws. The relationship between federal and state power is an ongoing topic of debate, and it is likely that this debate will continue for many years.
The Hierarchy of Courts
In the United States, the concept of federalism means that power is divided between two levels of government. These are the federal government and individual state governments. This has created a dual court system, with separate federal and state court systems.
The federal court system is completely independent of the state court systems and has the authority to arbitrate federal laws and determine their constitutionality. The state court systems, on the other hand, handle cases related to state laws.
The concept of separation of powers suggests that the courts should be separate from the other branches of government (the legislative and executive branches). However, the courts still rely on the other branches to function properly. For example, federal laws that federal courts arbitrate are passed by Congress and signed by the President. The executive branch is responsible for enforcing court decisions.
The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to create federal courts other than the Supreme Court and to determine their jurisdiction. This means that Congress controls the cases that can be heard in federal courts. Congress also has other constitutional responsibilities that determine how the courts operate. For example, Congress decides how many judges there should be and where they will work. Additionally, Congress approves the federal courts’ budget and appropriates money for the judiciary to operate.
The power of Congress over funding is often referred to as the power of the purse. The judiciary’s budget is a small part of the entire federal budget, accounting for less than one percent of it, according to the Administrative Office of the US Courts.
United States District Courts
The United States District Courts are the first level of the federal court system and are responsible for hearing a wide range of legal cases, both civil and criminal. These cases can include matters related to federal law, such as cases involving violations of federal statutes or disputes that cross state lines.
Jurisdiction refers to the authority of a court to hear and decide cases. The District Courts have jurisdiction to hear almost all types of federal cases, but Congress and the Constitution limit their powers. This means that there are certain types of cases that District Courts cannot hear and that Congress can pass laws that limit their authority.
There are 94 judicial districts in the United States, each with at least one District Court. These districts are designed to ensure that there is a District Court located within a reasonable distance of every citizen in the country. This helps to ensure that people can have access to the federal court system, regardless of where they live.
In addition to the 50 states, the District Court system includes the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, both of which are considered U.S. territories. Three other territories of the United States, namely the Virgin Islands, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands, also have District Courts that hear federal cases.
United States Courts of Appeals
The United States Court of Appeals is a level of the federal court system responsible for hearing appeals from the decisions made by the District Courts. The Court of Appeals is organized into regional circuits, with 12 circuits covering the entire United States. Each circuit has a specific number of states within its jurisdiction, and the courts within that circuit are responsible for hearing appeals from the District Courts located within their area.
One of the primary functions of the Court of Appeals is to review decisions made by lower courts, including the District Courts. These decisions can be appealed to the Court of Appeals by parties who are unhappy with the outcome of their case. The Court of Appeals is responsible for determining whether the lower court made any errors in its decision and whether those errors were significant enough to warrant a new trial or another remedy.
The Court of Appeals is also responsible for hearing appeals from decisions made by federal administrative agencies. These agencies are responsible for implementing and enforcing federal laws and regulations, and their decisions can have a significant impact on individuals and businesses.
Because the Court of Appeals is organized into circuits, it is sometimes called a circuit court. Each circuit has a specific number of judges appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. The judges on the Court of Appeals are responsible for upholding the law and ensuring that lower courts and administrative agencies follow the Constitution and federal statutes.
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the federal court system, consisting of the Chief Justice of the United States and eight associate justices. The Supreme Court has the responsibility to hear and decide legal cases that involve important questions about the Constitution or federal law. However, it only hears a limited number of cases each year based on specific guidelines established by Congress.
The standard that determines whether the Supreme Court may hear a case is known as a substantial federal question. This means the case must raise an important issue related to interpreting the Constitution or federal law. Cases originating in state courts may be eligible for review by the Supreme Court if they meet this standard.
State courts are responsible for interpreting and applying state laws and constitutions. However, their interpretations of federal law or the U.S. Constitution can be appealed to the Supreme Court for review. This means that if a state court decision is believed to conflict with federal law or the Constitution, the case can be appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has the power to decide whether or not to hear these cases.
State Court Structures
The state court system in the United States is a critical component of the legal system, responsible for handling legal matters within each state. Each state has its own court system, which is established by the state’s constitution and laws.
The highest court in each state is often referred to as a supreme court, and it serves as the court of last resort. This means that its decisions are final and cannot be appealed to any higher court within the state. Some states also have an intermediate court of appeals, which hears appeals from the lower courts. The intermediate court of appeals serves as a bridge between the lower courts and the state supreme court.
Below the appeals courts are the state trial courts, which are sometimes referred to as circuit or district courts. These courts are responsible for hearing and deciding the vast majority of legal cases that arise within the state. Historically, states had separate courts responsible for specific legal matters, such as probate, juvenile, or family court. However, many states have since adopted the federal model and have combined these various courts into a more general court system.
If a party is unhappy with the decision made by the trial court, they may appeal to the intermediate court of appeals in states that have them or to the court of last resort in states that do not. This ensures that the decisions made by lower courts can be reviewed by higher courts, which helps to ensure that the law is applied consistently and fairly.
The state court system is an essential component of the legal system in the United States, providing a forum for resolving legal disputes within each state. Its different levels of courts allow for appeals and ensure that cases can be reviewed by higher courts if necessary, helping to ensure that the law is applied consistently and fairly across the country.
The Hierarchy of Law Makers
The United States Constitution contains a clause called the supremacy clause, which is found in Article VI. This clause establishes that the Constitution, the laws made by Congress in accordance with the Constitution, and any treaties made under the authority of the United States are the highest law in the land. This means state laws that conflict with federal laws are invalid and cannot be enforced.
The exact meaning of the supremacy clause has been the subject of interpretation and debate over the years. However, the Supreme Court has issued several rulings to clarify its meaning. For example, in the case of Gibbons v. Ogden, the court held that when a state law conflicts with a federal law that is made in accordance with the Constitution, the federal law takes precedence, and the state law is invalid. In other words, if there is a conflict between a state law and a federal law, the federal law must be followed, and the state law cannot be enforced.
The supremacy clause is an important part of the United States Constitution that helps to ensure that the federal government has the power to make laws and that those laws take precedence over state laws. This helps to ensure that the law is applied consistently across the country and that there is no confusion or conflict between state and federal laws.
The Dual Executive
When discussing federalism, we often focus on the division of powers between the federal government and the states. However, there is another important aspect of federalism that is sometimes overlooked, and that is the dual executive. The dual executive refers to the two separate sets of executive functions that exist within the government structures of the states and the federal government.
At the federal level, there are federal laws and federal courts, just as there are state laws and state courts at the state level. In addition to this, there are also federal law enforcement agencies, such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF). These agencies are responsible for enforcing federal laws, which can include everything from drug trafficking and money laundering to terrorism and cybercrime.
On the other hand, law enforcement officers within the states, such as state troopers or local police officers, are responsible for enforcing state laws. This can include everything from traffic violations and petty theft to murder and other violent crimes.
However, it is important to note that each level of government can provide support to the law enforcement efforts of the other. For example, federal law enforcement agencies can work with state law enforcement officers to investigate and prosecute crimes violating federal and state laws. This can be especially important in cases where the crimes are complex or involve multiple jurisdictions.
Likewise, state law enforcement officers can provide support to federal law enforcement agencies when they are conducting investigations or making arrests within their state. This can be important in cases where federal law enforcement agencies do not have the resources or expertise to handle certain types of crimes independently.
By working together, federal and state law enforcement agencies can more effectively uphold the law and ensure justice is served. However, this also requires coordination and cooperation between the different levels of government, which can sometimes be challenging.
The dual executive is an important aspect of federalism that helps to ensure that the federal and state governments can work together to enforce the law and provide support to each other when necessary. While this can be complicated at times, it is essential for maintaining law and order in the United States.
The Third Layer of Cake
The system of government in the United States is often referred to as dual federalism, which means that there are separate but united spheres of power held by the federal government and the various states. This is sometimes compared to a layer cake, where each layer represents a different level of government. However, in a different type of federalism known as marble cake federalism, the powers of the state and federal governments overlap and work together, much like the marbling in a cake.
One important aspect of the criminal justice system in the United States is the role played by local governments. Local governments include the governing bodies of cities and counties throughout the country. Local governments are critical to the criminal justice system because most of the work done in the system happens at the local level. This includes the majority of police officers, who are employed by municipalities, as well as many law enforcement officers and correctional officers who work for county governments under the direction of the Sheriff’s Department.
However, it’s important to note that local and county agencies are generally considered part of the state government for legal purposes. This means that municipal police officers and county deputies are responsible for enforcing state laws, but they don’t have the authority to enforce federal laws. Instead, they must turn cases over to federal authorities if they involve violations of federal law.
Local governments are also empowered to create their own laws, known as ordinances. These laws are usually minor and only result in fines if they are violated. However, local governments don’t have the power to create laws that punish people with imprisonment. This authority is reserved for the state and federal governments.
Overall, the criminal justice system in the United States involves many different levels of government, including the federal government, the state governments, and the local governments. While each level has its own responsibilities and powers, they all work together to ensure that the laws are enforced and justice is served.
The United States has a dual federalism system where power is divided between the federal government and individual state governments. This means that both levels of government should be able to function independently of one another within their respective spheres of authority. The federal government has certain powers spelled out in the Constitution, while the states have retained their own powers. Over time, the federal government has come to play a more dominant role in certain areas, particularly in criminal justice, which has been the subject of much debate and controversy.
The United States has a dual court system, with separate federal and state court systems. The federal court system is completely independent of the state court systems and has the authority to arbitrate federal laws and determine their constitutionality. The state court systems handle cases related to state laws. The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to create federal courts other than the Supreme Court and to determine their jurisdiction. The United States District Courts are the first level of the federal court system and are responsible for hearing a wide range of legal cases, both civil and criminal. The Court of Appeals is responsible for hearing appeals from the decisions made by the District Courts, and it is organized into regional circuits.
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal court system, responsible for hearing and deciding legal cases that involve important questions about the Constitution or federal law. State courts make up the state court system in the United States, with each state having its own court system, including trial courts, intermediate courts of appeals, and supreme courts. The supremacy clause in the U.S. Constitution establishes that federal law takes precedence over state law in case of a conflict between the two. The dual executive refers to the two separate sets of executive functions that exist within the government structures of the states and the federal government. Finally, the criminal justice system in the United States involves many different levels of government, including the federal government, the state governments, and the local governments.
Article Six, Circuit Courts, Cooperative Federalism, Court of Last Resort, Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), Intermediate Court of Appeals, Layer Cake Federalism, Local Government, Marble Cake Federalism, Power of the Purse, Separation of Powers, Substantial Federal Question, Supremacy Clause, United States Courts of Appeals, United States District Courts
Last Modified: 07/13/2023
This work is licensed under an Open Educational Resource-Quality Master Source (OER-QMS) License.