Course: Introduction / Criminal Law
The Insanity Defense is a criminal defense based on the idea that a person who commits a crime because of a mental disease or defect is not culpable.
The insanity defense is a type of criminal defense that can be used by defendants who claim that they were not mentally responsible for their criminal behavior at the time of the offense. The defense is based on the idea that a person who is suffering from a mental illness or defect lacks the mental capacity to understand the nature and consequences of their actions or to distinguish right from wrong. As a result, they should not be held criminally responsible for their behavior.
The use of the insanity defense in criminal cases is highly controversial, and its availability and requirements vary depending on the jurisdiction. In the United States, the requirements for the insanity defense are determined by state law, but the Model Penal Code (MPC) provides a widely recognized framework for assessing a defendant’s mental state.
Under the MPC, the insanity defense requires proof that, at the time of the offense, the defendant suffered from a mental disease or defect that caused them to lack substantial capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of their conduct or to conform their conduct to the requirements of the law. This standard is known as the M’Naghten rule, which is based on a British case from 1843.
In addition to the M’Naghten rule, some states also recognize the irresistible impulse test, which allows defendants to claim that they were unable to control their actions due to their mental illness or defect. Other states use a broader substantial capacity test, which considers the defendant’s overall ability to understand the wrongfulness of their conduct and to conform their conduct to the law.
Even when the defendant can establish that they suffered from a mental disease or defect at the time of the offense, the insanity defense is not a guaranteed acquittal. In most jurisdictions, the burden of proof rests with the defendant to establish their insanity by a preponderance of the evidence, meaning that they must prove it more likely than not. Additionally, some states require that the defendant prove that they are not a danger to society before they can be released.
The use of the insanity defense in high-profile cases has generated significant controversy in the United States. Critics argue that the defense is overused and that it allows dangerous criminals to avoid responsibility for their actions. Supporters of the defense argue that it is necessary to ensure that mentally ill defendants are not punished for actions that they could not control and that it promotes fairness and justice in the criminal justice system.
The insanity defense is a criminal defense that allows defendants to claim that they were not responsible for their actions due to a mental disease or defect. While the requirements for the defense vary depending on the jurisdiction, the use of the defense remains controversial and has been the subject of ongoing debate in the criminal justice system.
On This Site
[ Glossary ]
Last Modified: 04/09/2023