Primary deviance refers to initial acts of rule-breaking that do not result in a person being labeled as a deviant or seeing themselves as deviant.
Understanding Primary Deviance in Criminology
Primary deviance is a concept from labeling theory, a sociological perspective that examines how societal reactions shape an individual’s self-identity. First introduced by Edwin Lemert in his work Social Pathology (1951), primary deviance refers to minor acts of deviance that individuals engage in without forming a deviant identity. These acts may include petty theft, underage drinking, or skipping school. Unlike secondary deviance, which occurs when an individual adopts a deviant label, primary deviance does not significantly impact a person’s social status or self-perception.
Edwin Lemert and the Development of Primary Deviance
Edwin Lemert, a criminologist and sociologist, developed the distinction between primary and secondary deviance as part of his broader labeling theory. He argued that deviant behavior is not just about breaking rules; it is also about how society reacts to those behaviors.
Lemert suggested that primary deviance is often a normal part of human behavior. Many people commit minor acts of rule-breaking at some point in their lives, but these acts do not necessarily lead to long-term deviant behavior. Because society often overlooks or excuses these minor infractions, individuals do not internalize a deviant identity. Instead, they continue to see themselves as part of mainstream society.
Characteristics of Primary Deviance
Several key characteristics define primary deviance:
- Lack of Social Reaction: Society does not strongly react to the deviant act, allowing the individual to continue their normal social role.
- No Lasting Impact on Identity: The individual does not see themselves as a deviant, nor does society label them as such.
- Often a One-Time or Minor Offense: The behavior is usually minor, such as skipping school, experimenting with drugs, or shoplifting once.
- Not Part of a Deviant Lifestyle: The person committing primary deviance does not associate with a deviant subculture or engage in continuous deviant behavior.
These characteristics highlight the temporary and often insignificant nature of primary deviance.
Examples of Primary Deviance
Primary deviance can take many forms, depending on the social and cultural context. Here are some common examples:
- Juvenile misbehavior: A teenager sneaks out past curfew once but does not make it a habit.
- Underage drinking: A high school student tries alcohol at a party but does not continue drinking regularly.
- Traffic violations: A person runs a red light or speeds but does not make reckless driving a pattern.
- Workplace misconduct: An employee calls in sick when they are not actually ill but does not frequently lie about being absent.
In each of these cases, the behavior does not lead to a long-term deviant identity because it is not met with strong societal reactions or self-labeling.
Primary Deviance and the Criminal Justice System
The criminal justice system plays a crucial role in determining whether an act of primary deviance escalates into secondary deviance. When authorities choose to punish or publicly label an individual, they increase the likelihood that the person will adopt a deviant identity. However, if society treats primary deviance as a minor issue and does not overreact, individuals can move past their behavior without becoming entrenched in a cycle of crime.
For instance, if a young person is caught shoplifting and receives a warning rather than formal charges, they are less likely to see themselves as a criminal. On the other hand, if they are arrested and labeled a thief, they might begin to associate with other criminals and engage in more serious offenses.
Primary Deviance vs. Secondary Deviance
Understanding the difference between primary and secondary deviance is essential in criminology:
| Primary Deviance | Secondary Deviance |
|---|---|
| Initial, often minor acts of deviance | Repeated or serious deviance influenced by social reaction |
| Does not result in a deviant label | Society labels the individual as deviant |
| No major impact on self-identity | The person adopts a deviant identity |
| Often seen as normal behavior | Leads to deeper involvement in deviant behavior |
Lemert emphasized that the transition from primary to secondary deviance occurs when societal reactions push individuals into a deviant role. This means that law enforcement, schools, and communities play a significant role in shaping whether someone’s deviance remains primary or escalates.
The Role of Social Control in Primary Deviance
Social control mechanisms influence how primary deviance is perceived and handled. These mechanisms include:
- Informal Social Control: Parents, teachers, and peers may discipline minor deviant acts without legal consequences. This helps prevent minor infractions from escalating into larger problems.
- Formal Social Control: The legal system enforces laws and punishments. If law enforcement responds harshly to primary deviance, it may contribute to secondary deviance.
- Cultural and Societal Norms: In some societies, certain acts of deviance are more tolerated than others. For example, minor drug use might be treated as a public health issue rather than a criminal act in some countries.
By understanding how social control works, policymakers and criminal justice professionals can develop strategies to prevent unnecessary criminalization of minor offenses.
How Labeling Affects Future Behavior
One of the most significant concerns regarding primary deviance is how labeling can influence future behavior. Studies have shown that when individuals are formally labeled as criminals, they may struggle with employment, education, and social relationships. This stigma can lead them into further criminal activities, reinforcing a cycle of deviance.
Labeling theorists argue that reducing unnecessary labeling can help prevent individuals from becoming trapped in the criminal justice system. Instead of focusing on punishment for minor offenses, alternative approaches like rehabilitation, diversion programs, and restorative justice can help individuals reintegrate into society without adopting a deviant identity.
Conclusion
Primary deviance is an important concept in criminology that helps explain why some individuals engage in minor rule-breaking without becoming long-term deviants. Edwin Lemert’s distinction between primary and secondary deviance highlights the role of social reactions in shaping criminal behavior. Understanding primary deviance allows policymakers, law enforcement, and educators to develop better strategies for preventing crime without reinforcing negative labels. By focusing on rehabilitation and social support rather than punishment, societies can reduce the risk of minor deviance escalating into more serious criminal behavior.
[ Glossary ]
Last Modified: 03/05/2025