assigned female at birth | Campus Safe Words

TERM: assigned female at birth
RISK LEVEL: High

Why It’s Risky

The phrase “assigned female at birth” is rooted in gender identity discourse and is commonly used in transgender and nonbinary contexts. It is increasingly viewed as ideologically charged by lawmakers who oppose DEI-related terminology in public institutions. Laws like Florida’s Stop W.O.K.E. Act and Arkansas Act 1002 prohibit teaching or promoting views that suggest sex is socially constructed or arbitrarily designated. Using this phrase in syllabi, trainings, or institutional materials may be interpreted as aligning with contested gender theories, potentially violating state restrictions.

Common Critiques

Critics argue that the phrase undermines the scientific and legal concept of biological sex by suggesting it is merely a subjective label. They contend that the term promotes a worldview centered on gender identity ideology rather than empirical science. Opponents also see the phrase as advancing political activism in educational or healthcare settings, especially when it appears in student programming, counseling, or staff development initiatives.

When It’s Still Appropriate

“Assigned female at birth” may be appropriate in medical, psychological, or gender studies contexts where it appears in peer-reviewed literature or is necessary for understanding specific populations. In these cases, the term should be clearly framed within a scholarly or clinical framework, not as an institutional value or policy. Faculty should present the term as part of a broader academic discussion, especially in politically sensitive states.

Suggested Substitutes

1. Biological female (for legal or scientific use)

2. Female at birth (when referencing demographic data)

3. Sex designated on birth certificate (in administrative contexts)

4. Documented sex (for policy or records-related matters)

5. Anatomical female (in clinical or health-related discussions)

Notes:
Avoid using “assigned female at birth” in institutional messaging, training materials, or general education unless required for disciplinary accuracy. When use is necessary, provide academic context and acknowledge its presence in current scholarly or clinical frameworks. Clarify that usage does not reflect institutional endorsement of any particular gender theory.