biologically female | Campus Safe Words

TERM: biologically female
RISK LEVEL: Moderate

Why It’s Risky

The term “biologically female” is increasingly scrutinized in gender-related discussions, where it may be seen as reductive or dismissive of gender identity. However, in conservative-led states, recent legislation—including Florida’s Stop W.O.K.E. Act and various executive orders—explicitly favors biological definitions of sex in law, education, and athletics. While the term is unlikely to draw criticism from the political right, it may be seen as insensitive or politically charged by students or faculty who advocate for gender-inclusive language. Thus, the risk stems from campus climate rather than state oversight.

Common Critiques

Opponents of the term often argue that it conflates sex and gender or delegitimizes transgender and nonbinary identities by emphasizing anatomy over identity. Some view it as a marker of political alignment or cultural resistance to inclusive language. On campuses with active DEI programming or inclusive language policies, its use may generate complaints, even if it aligns with current legal definitions in some states.

When It’s Still Appropriate

“Biologically female” remains appropriate in legal, medical, and scientific contexts where clarity about sex-based characteristics is necessary, such as in health education, biological research, or athletic policy. It is also defensible when aligning language with state laws that define sex based on biology for purposes such as reporting, eligibility, or facilities access. In these cases, the term should be used with precision and respect for institutional guidelines.

Suggested Substitutes

1. Female (when the context clearly refers to biological sex)

2. Sex-based classification (in legal or policy contexts)

3. Female at birth (for neutral demographic reference)

4. Anatomical female (in clinical discussions)

5. Documented sex: female (in administrative or records contexts)

Notes:
Use “biologically female” only when the distinction is relevant and supported by legal, medical, or disciplinary frameworks. In politically sensitive or DEI-oriented environments, be aware that some audiences may find the term exclusionary. When necessary, pair it with context to clarify its intended use without signaling opposition to inclusive practices. Avoid using the term casually or in settings where gender identity is the primary focus unless required for clarity or compliance.