injustice | Campus Safe Words

TERM: injustice
RISK LEVEL: extreme

Definition

“Injustice” refers to actions, policies, or outcomes perceived as morally wrong, unfair, or oppressive, often rooted in social, legal, or institutional systems. In higher education, the term is frequently used in discussions of systemic racism, historical oppression, or structural barriers to access and success.

Why It’s Risky

The term “injustice” is highly politically charged and often seen as a marker of ideological positioning, particularly within the context of DEI discourse. In states with legislation targeting perceived progressive indoctrination—such as Florida’s Stop W.O.K.E. Act and Oklahoma’s Executive Order 2023-31—use of the term in official documents may be viewed as aligning the institution with activist movements or social justice advocacy. Critics argue that “injustice” implies moral condemnation of existing systems and may suggest institutional complicity or a commitment to ideological reform. When used in mission statements, strategic plans, or public programming, the term can trigger concerns about compelled speech, partisanship, and deviation from a neutral, academic mission. In politically sensitive environments, its use may invite investigations, donor withdrawal, or reputational harm.

Common Critiques

Opponents argue that “injustice” frames societal or institutional issues through a narrow, moralizing lens that often lacks nuance or neutrality. The term is frequently associated with activism and protest movements, leading some lawmakers and trustees to question its appropriateness in taxpayer-funded education settings. Critics contend that describing disparities or historical events as “injustice” presumes intent and guilt, often without sufficient evidence or legal grounding. This can undermine the perception of academic objectivity and shift institutional focus from education to advocacy. In politically regulated states, documents referencing “injustice” have been cited in efforts to shut down programs, block funding, or censure faculty. Additionally, some view the term as divisive, arguing that it promotes a narrative of collective victimhood and institutional blame rather than constructive dialogue or civic engagement. In high-profile settings, its use may be interpreted as a challenge to traditional values or national identity.

Suggested Substitutes

Unfair barriers to student success (in program descriptions);
Historical challenges affecting certain communities (in curriculum outlines);
Need to expand access and opportunity (in strategic documents);
Recognition of complex social dynamics (in academic research);
Efforts to promote fairness and integrity (in mission statements)

These alternatives allow for acknowledgment of social context while maintaining a neutral, academically grounded tone.

When It May Still Be Appropriate

“Injustice” may be appropriate in academic research, literature, or history courses where the term is contextually analyzed and pedagogically relevant. It may also appear in public humanities programming or federally funded grants that explicitly call for such framing. Outside of those settings, institutions should avoid using the term in official communications, policy documents, or hiring materials to preserve neutrality.

NOTES: Avoid the term “injustice” in strategic, evaluative, or policy language unless specifically required by a grant or academic framework. Favor terms that emphasize fairness, access, and educational mission to remain politically defensible and legally compliant.