Course: Procedural Law
Barron v. Baltimore established that the Bill of Rights only applied to the federal government, not the states, which was later changed through the process of incorporation.
Barron v. Baltimore was a landmark case that clarified that the Bill of Rights only applied to the federal government, not to the states, allowing states to pass their own laws on fundamental rights; however, over time, the Court has applied many of these protections to the states as well, ensuring that individuals have basic rights and protections across the United States.
The decision in Barron v. Baltimore was controversial, as it meant that individuals in the states did not have the same level of protection for their fundamental rights as those under federal jurisdiction. In the case, John Barron, a wharf owner in Baltimore, Maryland, argued that the city had violated the Fifth Amendment by taking his property without just compensation. The Court ruled against Barron, stating that the Bill of Rights only applied to the federal government, not to the states.
This decision had significant implications for the relationship between the federal government and the states. It meant that the states were free to pass their own laws and regulations on issues such as freedom of speech, religion, and other fundamental rights, even if they were different from those of the federal government. This led to a patchwork of laws and regulations across the country, which could be confusing and inconsistent for individuals who moved between states.
Over time, however, the Court has used other cases and legal principles to apply many of the protections in the Bill of Rights to the states as well. This process is known as incorporation, and it has been a gradual and ongoing process. For example, the Court has ruled that the states must respect freedom of speech and religion under the First Amendment, the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment, and the right to a fair trial under the Sixth Amendment, among others.
Incorporation has helped to ensure that individuals have certain basic rights and protections no matter where they live in the United States. It has also helped to clarify the relationship between the federal government and the states and has provided a framework for resolving conflicts between federal and state law.
In conclusion, Barron v. Baltimore was a significant case that established the principle that the Bill of Rights only applied to the federal government, not to the states. While this decision initially meant that individuals in the states did not have the same level of protection for their fundamental rights, the Court has gradually applied many of these protections to the states as well, helping to ensure that individuals have basic rights and protections across the United States.
[ Glossary ]
Last Modified: 05/04/2023