A single-subject research design is a method that studies the behavior of one participant or a small group over time, often using repeated measures.
What Is Single-Subject Research Design?
Single-subject research design refers to a set of scientific methods used to observe, measure, and analyze the behavior or responses of a single individual or a very small group. Unlike large-scale studies that rely on group averages, this design focuses on detailed data from a few subjects, often using repeated observations over time. Researchers use it to test the effects of an intervention or treatment on that specific subject. This approach is common in psychology, education, and applied behavior analysis.
Instead of comparing one group to another, researchers in this type of design compare the subject to themselves over time. They track changes in the subject’s behavior or performance before, during, and after an intervention. By doing this, they can make informed conclusions about whether the treatment had any effect.
Key Characteristics of Single-Subject Research Design
Focus on the Individual
The central feature of this design is its focus on individuals rather than groups. While group-based studies aim for broad generalizations, single-subject research provides detailed insight into how one person reacts to a treatment.
This approach is useful when studying rare conditions, highly personalized interventions, or specific behaviors that vary widely across people. Researchers can gain a deep understanding of the processes at play within an individual.
Use of Repeated Measures
A single-subject study usually involves collecting data across multiple time points. This might include several days, weeks, or even months of observation. Researchers gather baseline data first, then continue collecting data during the intervention phase, and sometimes afterward as well. This allows them to observe trends and patterns over time.
Visual Analysis of Data
In single-subject research, data is often presented graphically. Charts help researchers and readers easily see how behavior changes across phases. These visuals can show whether a treatment effect occurred and whether that change was immediate or gradual.
Experimental Control Within the Subject
This type of research often includes built-in controls by comparing a subject’s performance under different conditions. For example, a researcher may compare behavior before the treatment (baseline phase) and during the treatment phase. This within-subject comparison helps rule out other explanations for the behavior change.
Flexibility in Application
Single-subject research designs are flexible. They allow adjustments during the study, such as adding phases, changing treatments, or replicating findings across settings or behaviors. This makes them suitable for applied fields like special education or clinical psychology.
Common Types of Single-Subject Research Designs
A-B Design
This is the most basic single-subject design. It includes two phases:
- A (Baseline phase): Researchers observe and measure behavior without intervention.
- B (Intervention phase): Researchers introduce the treatment and continue measuring behavior.
While simple, this design does not control well for outside influences. So it cannot fully prove that the intervention caused the change.
A-B-A or A-B-A-B Design
These are withdrawal designs. They help establish a stronger connection between the treatment and the behavior change.
- A-B-A design includes a second baseline after removing the treatment.
- A-B-A-B design adds another round of treatment to see if behavior changes again.
If the behavior improves during the B phase and worsens during the second A phase, it suggests that the treatment is responsible for the improvement.
Multiple-Baseline Design
This design involves observing several behaviors, settings, or individuals. Researchers stagger when they introduce the treatment across these areas.
For example, a teacher might use a new reading method with three students but introduce it to each one at different times. If all three show improvement only after receiving the treatment, it strengthens the evidence that the method works.
This design is helpful when withdrawing a treatment would be unethical or harmful.
Alternating Treatments Design
This design allows the researcher to quickly compare two or more interventions. Treatments are switched back and forth across sessions, and the subject’s responses are tracked.
It is useful when researchers want to see which of several interventions works best for an individual.
Changing Criterion Design
In this design, researchers gradually change the performance goal or criterion during the treatment phase. For example, a student might first be rewarded for reading five pages a day, then ten, then fifteen.
If the student’s reading behavior increases in line with the changing goals, the researcher can conclude that the treatment is effective.
Why Use Single-Subject Research in Social Sciences?
Single-subject research designs are especially valuable in fields where individual differences matter. Here are some reasons why social science researchers use them:
Applied Settings
In real-world settings like classrooms, clinics, or homes, researchers often need to tailor interventions to the individual. Single-subject designs allow them to test whether those personalized strategies actually work.
Ethical Considerations
Sometimes it is not ethical to withhold a potentially helpful treatment from a control group. With single-subject designs, every participant can receive the treatment, and their own behavior serves as the comparison.
Specific Behavior Focus
Single-subject designs work well for studying specific behaviors, like a child’s on-task behavior in class or a patient’s anxiety levels. Researchers can measure these behaviors in detail, session by session.
Small Sample Needs
When it is hard to recruit large groups—such as when studying rare disorders—single-subject methods are ideal. They allow meaningful conclusions from just one or a few people.
Data Collection in Single-Subject Designs
Researchers must gather data carefully and consistently to draw valid conclusions.
Frequency Counts
This method involves counting how often a behavior occurs during a specific period. For example, a teacher might record how many times a student raises their hand during math class.
Duration Recording
This tracks how long a behavior lasts. For example, a psychologist might measure how long a person maintains eye contact during therapy.
Interval Recording
This method breaks observation time into equal intervals. Observers record whether the behavior occurred in each interval.
Permanent Products
This involves collecting actual work or results from the participant. For example, counting how many math problems a student completed correctly.
Strengths and Limitations
Strengths
- Offers deep insight into individual behavior
- Flexible and customizable to different settings
- Allows for visual data analysis
- Helps evaluate personalized interventions
- Reduces ethical issues related to control groups
Limitations
- Limited generalizability to larger populations
- May require extensive observation and time
- Observer bias can affect data accuracy
- Visual analysis can be subjective
- Sometimes not suitable for behaviors that change slowly
Examples from Social Science Fields
Psychology
A psychologist might use an A-B-A-B design to test if a new relaxation technique helps reduce a client’s anxiety levels over several weeks.
Education
A special education teacher might use a multiple-baseline design to introduce a reading program to three students at different times and track their progress.
Criminology
A juvenile probation officer could use single-subject design to see how curfew enforcement affects a teen’s late-night activity, measuring behavior across phases.
Political Science
Though less common in political science, researchers might use this method to track how one individual’s civic behavior changes in response to different types of political messaging over time.
Anthropology
An anthropologist studying a unique community leader might observe how the leader’s communication style changes after attending a conflict resolution training program.
Conclusion
Single-subject research design is a powerful method for understanding how specific interventions affect individuals. Its focus on repeated measures, personalized data, and visual analysis makes it especially useful in applied social science settings. While it may not always lead to broad generalizations, it provides clear, useful evidence about what works for a particular person or group. Researchers value this design for its flexibility, ethical advantages, and rich detail. By studying behavior over time within a subject, this approach gives real insight into cause and effect in a way that group studies sometimes cannot.
Glossary Return to Doc's Research Glossary
Last Modified: 03/27/2025