The Solomon four-group design is an experimental method that controls for pretest effects by combining pretested and non-pretested groups in a study.
What Is the Solomon Four-Group Design?
The Solomon four-group design is a powerful experimental research method used to test whether taking a pretest influences how participants respond to a treatment. This design includes four separate groups that receive different combinations of pretesting, treatment, and posttesting. Researchers often use this method in social science to improve the reliability and validity of experiments, especially when they are concerned that a pretest might change participants’ behavior or responses.
The design was developed by psychologist Richard L. Solomon in the 1940s. His goal was to solve a key problem in experimental research: sometimes, simply taking a pretest can affect how people respond to the rest of a study. For example, if a student takes a quiz before a lesson, they might pay more attention during the lesson or become more anxious, which could change their posttest performance. The Solomon design helps separate the effects of the treatment from the effects of the pretest.
Structure of the Solomon Four-Group Design
In this design, researchers divide participants into four groups. Each group follows a different sequence of steps, as shown below:
- Group 1: Pretest → Treatment → Posttest
- Group 2: Pretest → No Treatment → Posttest
- Group 3: No Pretest → Treatment → Posttest
- Group 4: No Pretest → No Treatment → Posttest
By comparing the results across these four groups, researchers can identify:
- The effect of the treatment
- The effect of the pretest
- Whether the pretest interacts with the treatment
Each group plays a specific role in helping researchers answer different questions. Group 1 shows what happens when people take a pretest and get the treatment. Group 2 shows what happens when people take a pretest but do not get the treatment. Group 3 shows what happens when people do not take a pretest but do get the treatment. Group 4 acts as a control group that receives no pretest and no treatment.
Why Use the Solomon Four-Group Design?
In social science, researchers often worry that a pretest might influence outcomes. This design solves that problem by giving them a way to check if the pretest is causing changes in behavior, not just the treatment.
Controlling for Pretest Effects
In many experiments, a pretest is used to measure participants’ baseline knowledge, attitude, or behavior before introducing a treatment. However, this can sometimes “tip off” participants about the purpose of the study. When that happens, their responses on the posttest may not reflect the true effect of the treatment.
The Solomon four-group design lets researchers compare participants who took a pretest with those who did not. This comparison reveals whether the pretest itself influenced the outcome.
Improving Internal Validity
Internal validity refers to how confidently researchers can say that the treatment caused any observed effects. The more control researchers have over variables, the stronger their conclusions. Because the Solomon design includes multiple comparison groups, it helps eliminate alternative explanations for the results.
Enhancing External Validity
This design can also improve external validity, or how well the results can be applied to other settings. If researchers find that the treatment works equally well for both pretested and non-pretested participants, they can be more confident that the treatment would work in the real world, where people are not usually pretested.
How the Solomon Four-Group Design Works in Practice
To understand how this design is used, consider a real-world example in education research. Imagine that researchers want to test whether a new reading program improves students’ reading comprehension.
Step-by-Step Example
- Recruit participants from the same grade level across several schools.
- Randomly assign them to four groups:
- Group 1: Takes a reading comprehension pretest, then uses the new program, then takes a posttest.
- Group 2: Takes the same pretest, does not use the program, and takes the posttest.
- Group 3: Does not take a pretest, uses the program, and takes the posttest.
- Group 4: Does not take a pretest, does not use the program, and takes the posttest.
- Analyze results to answer key questions:
- Did the new program improve reading comprehension?
- Did taking a pretest change how students responded to the program?
- Did students who were not pretested still benefit from the program?
This approach helps ensure that any improvement in reading scores is likely due to the program itself, not just the effect of being tested ahead of time.
Benefits of the Solomon Four-Group Design
This design offers several advantages that make it ideal for experimental research in the social sciences.
1. Separates Pretest Effects from Treatment Effects
By including groups that receive only one of the two (either a pretest or treatment), this design makes it easier to spot whether the pretest is influencing the outcome. This is especially helpful when researchers suspect that the pretest might “prime” participants in some way.
2. Offers Strong Experimental Control
Because it uses random assignment and multiple comparison groups, the design helps control for confounding variables. This strengthens the study’s internal validity and improves the reliability of the findings.
3. Tests for Interaction Effects
An interaction effect occurs when the impact of one variable depends on the presence of another. In this design, researchers can test whether the treatment only works when a pretest is present, or if it works equally well without a pretest. This gives a more complete picture of how the treatment works.
4. Useful for Pilot Studies and Full Experiments
Although it requires more effort and participants, the design is well-suited for both pilot studies (to test new ideas) and larger experiments. Researchers in psychology, education, and public health often use this design when testing new programs or interventions.
Limitations of the Solomon Four-Group Design
Despite its strengths, this design has some challenges.
1. Requires a Large Sample Size
Since the study includes four groups, researchers need more participants than in a basic two-group experiment. This can make the study harder to carry out, especially when resources or time are limited.
2. More Complex to Analyze
The design involves multiple comparisons between groups. Researchers must carefully analyze the data to understand which effects are due to the treatment, the pretest, or both. This often involves using statistical tests such as analysis of variance (ANOVA).
3. Demands Careful Planning
Because of its complexity, researchers must plan carefully to make sure each group is balanced and treated consistently. Any mistakes in how the groups are assigned or treated can threaten the study’s validity.
When to Use the Solomon Four-Group Design
Researchers often choose this design when:
- They are testing a new intervention or treatment
- There is a strong chance that the pretest will influence participants
- They need to know whether the treatment works outside of test-like settings
- They want to compare multiple effects in a single study
This design is especially popular in education research, psychology, and health behavior studies. For example, a psychologist testing a therapy technique might use this design to see if clients benefit from the technique itself—or if just thinking about their problems during the pretest changes how they feel.
How It Compares to Other Designs
The Solomon four-group design is more comprehensive than a simple two-group pretest-posttest design. It also offers more protection against threats to validity than a posttest-only design. While more demanding in terms of time, planning, and sample size, it gives richer, more accurate results.
Other experimental designs include:
- Pretest-posttest control group design: Only two groups, both pretested.
- Posttest-only control group design: Only two groups, no pretest.
- Factorial design: Tests two or more treatments at once.
Each has its own strengths, but the Solomon four-group design is unique in how it isolates the effect of the pretest.
Summary
The Solomon four-group design is a powerful tool for researchers who want to make sure that their results reflect the true effects of a treatment—not just the act of taking a pretest. By including four carefully structured groups, this design helps identify and control for multiple sources of influence in a study. Though it requires more participants and planning, it offers strong protection against bias and greater insight into how treatments really work.
Glossary Return to Doc's Research Glossary
Last Modified: 03/27/2025