Sources to Avoid refers to unreliable, biased, outdated, or non-academic materials that should not be used in rigorous social science research and writing.
Understanding Sources to Avoid
When conducting research in the social sciences, choosing the right sources is one of the most important steps. Good sources help support arguments with credible evidence. Bad sources can weaken your claims and make your research seem untrustworthy. Knowing what types of sources to avoid helps researchers stay on track, use accurate information, and build strong, well-supported studies.
Why Some Sources Are Not Suitable
In social science research, not all information is created equal. Some sources seem helpful at first glance, but may actually mislead or confuse readers. Social science research aims to explain, analyze, or predict human behavior and social patterns using evidence-based reasoning. Using weak or inappropriate sources can distort your findings or lead to false conclusions.
Researchers need to be careful when selecting information. They should question where the information comes from, who wrote it, and why it was created. Even if something is easy to find online or sounds persuasive, it does not automatically make it a reliable research source.
Common Types of Sources to Avoid
1. Wikipedia and Similar Crowd-Sourced Sites
Wikipedia can be a helpful starting point for learning about a topic, but it should not be cited in academic work. The site is edited by volunteers, which means the information can change at any time and may include errors or bias. While many Wikipedia pages list useful references at the bottom, those references—rather than the Wikipedia article itself—are more appropriate for research.
Other similar websites that allow open editing, such as forums, wikis, and community Q&A sites, suffer from the same issues. They lack peer review, and their content is not always written by experts.
2. Blogs and Personal Websites
Blogs, unless hosted by scholars or institutions with expertise in the topic, are often opinion-based. Personal blogs usually reflect the thoughts and experiences of individuals without formal review. While these can sometimes offer insight into public opinion or cultural trends, they do not count as academic evidence. Many do not cite their sources or follow research standards.
In social science, researchers must rely on sources that go through academic or editorial review to make sure the information is accurate and trustworthy.
3. Outdated Textbooks or Articles
Social sciences evolve quickly as new data emerges and theories change. Using outdated materials can lead to referencing ideas that are no longer considered accurate. As a general rule, sources should be no more than 5 to 10 years old, especially when discussing current events, new policies, or evolving social trends.
While classic works in sociology or psychology still hold value, researchers should balance them with newer studies that reflect modern findings and current social conditions.
4. Non-Peer-Reviewed Articles
Peer-reviewed journal articles are considered the gold standard in research. This process means that other scholars in the field reviewed the study and confirmed it meets high academic standards. Articles that have not been peer-reviewed, such as those from trade magazines, opinion pieces, or unverified research reports, often lack this level of scrutiny.
Non-peer-reviewed sources may be useful for context or background, but they should not be used as evidence to support a central claim in your research.
5. Commercial or Sponsored Content
Many websites publish articles that look like news or research but are actually sponsored by businesses trying to sell products or promote ideas. These sources are often biased and may leave out key facts that do not support their message.
For example, a company selling a health supplement might publish “research” showing its benefits. This type of content is not neutral and should be avoided in academic research.
6. Social Media Posts and Comments
Social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram offer a window into public opinion, but they do not provide reliable evidence. Posts are short, rarely supported by evidence, and often based on personal opinion or emotion.
While social media can be analyzed as a source of data (especially in studies of communication or social behavior), it should not be used to support claims unless properly collected, coded, and analyzed within a structured methodology.
7. Unverified News Sources
Not all news outlets follow the same standards. Some may have political bias, spread misinformation, or use sensational headlines to attract attention. Researchers should be cautious about using articles from tabloids, biased news sites, or outlets known for publishing unverified stories.
When using news sources, stick with well-known, reputable organizations that follow journalistic standards and cite their sources. Even then, use news reports mainly for context, not as evidence for core research claims.
8. Predatory Journals
Predatory journals are fake or low-quality publications that claim to be peer-reviewed but actually accept almost any submission to collect publishing fees. They often lack proper editorial boards, do not follow accepted research standards, and publish articles without checking for accuracy.
Researchers can avoid these by checking the journal’s website, looking at its peer-review process, and consulting lists of trusted academic journals, such as those found in major academic databases.
How to Identify an Unreliable Source
Here are some key signs a source might not be suitable for academic research:
- The author is anonymous or lacks credentials.
- The source contains grammatical errors or poor writing.
- There are no references or citations.
- The tone is emotional, biased, or unprofessional.
- The website is full of targeted ads or links to specific types of products.
- The information contradicts well-established research without providing strong evidence.
A reliable source usually includes an author’s name and qualifications, uses formal language, and cites other reputable research. It should be published by a respected institution, academic press, or peer-reviewed journal.
Why Avoiding Weak Sources Matters
Social science research often informs public policy, educational programs, health interventions, and community planning. If the research is based on poor sources, it can lead to decisions that harm people or waste resources. For example, if a criminology study draws conclusions from an unverified blog, its findings may not hold up in a courtroom or influence real-world change.
Good research builds on solid evidence. By avoiding weak sources, researchers strengthen their arguments, earn the trust of their audience, and contribute to the field in a meaningful way.
Using Better Alternatives
Instead of using poor sources, researchers should focus on these high-quality alternatives:
- Peer-reviewed journal articles from academic databases like JSTOR, PsycINFO, or Google Scholar.
- Books published by academic presses, such as university presses.
- Government or NGO reports from sources like the U.S. Census Bureau or the World Health Organization.
- Institutional websites, such as universities or recognized research organizations.
If you’re unsure about a source, it’s better to ask a teacher, professor, or librarian. They can help you figure out whether the material is trustworthy.
Final Thoughts
Avoiding weak or unreliable sources is not about censorship or limiting ideas. It’s about protecting the quality and credibility of your research. Strong sources make strong arguments. They show that you have done your homework, understand the topic, and can back up your claims with evidence.
As a rule, ask yourself: Who wrote this? Why did they write it? And how do I know it’s true? These questions will help you avoid bad sources and choose ones that make your research better.
Glossary Return to Doc's Research Glossary
Last Modified: 03/27/2025