activists | Campus Safe Words

TERM: activists
RISK LEVEL: High

Why It’s Risky

The term “activists” is politically charged and often signals alignment with progressive or partisan movements. Under state laws such as Florida’s Stop W.O.K.E. Act and Texas Senate Bill 17, public institutions are discouraged from endorsing or appearing to promote ideological positions. Referring to individuals or groups as “activists” in a positive or uncritical manner may be interpreted as institutional support for specific political causes. This is particularly sensitive in public programming, faculty bios, course descriptions, or student leadership development.

Common Critiques

Critics argue that celebrating “activists” elevates political engagement over academic rigor and can imply institutional endorsement of controversial agendas. The term is often associated with left-leaning social justice causes, and its use may suggest bias, especially when alternative perspectives are not represented. Legislators and trustees may view references to activists as signaling ideological alignment with movements they believe are divisive or oppositional to state values.

When It’s Still Appropriate

“Activists” may be appropriate when used historically or analytically, such as in courses covering civil rights, labor history, or political movements. In these cases, the term should be framed within a scholarly context that examines motivations, methods, and outcomes from multiple angles. It can also be used in political science or media studies when analyzing the role of activists in shaping public discourse or policy.

Suggested Substitutes

1. Advocates (for individuals promoting a cause, used cautiously)

2. Community organizers (in sociological or historical contexts)

3. Movement leaders (when discussing historical or political figures)

4. Public participants (for general civic involvement)

5. Social reformers (in historical analysis)

Notes:
Use with caution in faculty profiles, program titles, or course objectives. If the term appears, balance it with references to a range of ideological or political viewpoints. When describing current individuals or groups, focus on their roles, goals, or affiliations rather than labeling them as “activists.” This approach reduces the risk of perceived endorsement or politicization.