cultural competence | Campus Safe Words

TERM: cultural competence
RISK LEVEL: High

Why It’s Risky

The term “cultural competence” is widely used in education, healthcare, and social services to promote awareness and effective engagement with diverse populations. However, in conservative-led states, it is increasingly viewed as a DEI-aligned term that suggests individuals must adopt specific attitudes or beliefs about race, identity, or systemic bias. Under laws such as Texas Senate Bill 17 and Florida’s Stop W.O.K.E. Act, using “cultural competence” in training, hiring criteria, or institutional goals may be interpreted as compelled ideological conformity.

Common Critiques

Critics argue that “cultural competence” often implies that individuals are deficient unless they accept particular views about race, gender, or historical injustice. It is seen as reinforcing identity politics and mandating sensitivity training rooted in contested social theories. Legislators and trustees may question its inclusion in curriculum, staff evaluations, or professional development as a sign of ideological bias or institutional activism.

When It’s Still Appropriate

“Cultural competence” may be appropriate in clinical education, counseling, or language instruction when referring to specific communication skills or practices validated by professional standards. It can also appear in academic literature reviews or accreditation documentation when required by external agencies. In these cases, the term should be tied to discipline-specific skills and clearly separated from political or moral imperatives.

Suggested Substitutes

1. Cross-cultural communication (in healthcare or education)

2. Interpersonal effectiveness (in training and HR contexts)

3. Global awareness (in international or travel programs)

4. Respect for differences (in general conduct guidance)

5. Professional adaptability (in clinical or service professions)

Notes:
Avoid using “cultural competence” in learning outcomes, hiring rubrics, or mission statements unless required by accrediting bodies or licensure standards. When necessary, define the term narrowly and frame it in terms of professional performance, not belief or identity alignment. In politically sensitive environments, substitute skill-based terminology that emphasizes respectful interaction without signaling ideological commitments.