cultural heritage | Campus Safe Words

TERM: cultural heritage
RISK LEVEL: Moderate

Why It’s Risky

“Cultural heritage” is generally viewed as a neutral term when referring to historical artifacts, traditions, and community practices. However, in politically sensitive contexts—especially under legislation like Florida’s Stop W.O.K.E. Act—its use may draw concern if framed in ways that emphasize grievance, systemic oppression, or collective victimhood. Risk increases when the term is paired with DEI narratives or used to justify special programming, funding priorities, or curriculum seen as identity-driven rather than academically grounded.

Common Critiques

Critics argue that “cultural heritage” can be used to promote identity-based distinctions that prioritize group narratives over shared history or civic unity. In some cases, the term is seen as a vehicle for advancing ethnic or racial advocacy under the banner of preservation or awareness. Legislators may scrutinize its use in courses, programming, or hiring if it appears to advance ideological goals rather than cultural education.

When It’s Still Appropriate

“Cultural heritage” is appropriate in art history, anthropology, archaeology, museum studies, and language preservation when used to describe artifacts, customs, or historic contributions. It may also be used in community engagement or international education when referring to UNESCO standards or public history efforts. In these contexts, it should remain descriptive and academically grounded.

Suggested Substitutes

1. Historical traditions (in curriculum or general education)

2. Ancestral customs (when referring to long-standing practices)

3. Regional history or heritage (for domestic or civic discussions)

4. Artistic legacy (in humanities or fine arts)

5. Heritage preservation (for museums or cultural institutions)

Notes:
Use “cultural heritage” with a clear academic or historical focus and avoid linking it to political activism or entitlement claims. When applicable, emphasize its relevance to scholarly study or preservation rather than identity-based advocacy. In politically sensitive environments, frame the term around historical documentation and educational value, not social justice objectives.