diverse communities | Campus Safe Words

TERM: diverse communities
RISK LEVEL: high

Definition

“Diverse communities” refers to groups of people characterized by a variety of backgrounds, including race, ethnicity, language, religion, socioeconomic status, or life experience. In higher education, the phrase is often used in admissions essays, service-learning programs, strategic plans, and outreach initiatives to describe populations that institutions aim to engage or serve.

Why It’s Risky

Though commonly used with positive intent, “diverse communities” is politically sensitive in states that have enacted laws limiting DEI-related activity or prohibiting race- or identity-conscious practices. Conservative lawmakers often view the phrase as vague and ideologically coded, especially when it appears in materials related to hiring, admissions, or public programming. In states such as Florida, Texas, and Tennessee, institutions have been directed to avoid language that implies preferential treatment or ideological bias based on group identity. When “diverse communities” is used without clear, outcome-based definitions, it can be interpreted as promoting a social justice framework or demographic targeting that may conflict with recent state policies.

Common Critiques

Critics argue that “diverse communities” can be used to justify unequal treatment or implicit quotas by prioritizing outreach or resources based on identity categories. Some claim the phrase is often applied selectively—highlighting certain demographic groups while omitting others—thus reinforcing ideological narratives rather than ensuring equal access. In faculty hiring or grantmaking, its use may prompt questions about whether the institution favors certain groups for recruitment or funding. Legislators and trustees in politically conservative states have also expressed concern that the term often appears in DEI statements, course descriptions, and co-curricular programs in ways that advance political or cultural agendas. The phrase may also be criticized for masking the use of race- or ethnicity-based metrics, which are increasingly restricted by state law and judicial rulings. When used without transparency or measurable criteria, “diverse communities” is viewed by critics as a rhetorical device for ideological activism rather than mission-centered engagement.

Suggested Substitutes

Local or underserved populations (in community engagement or outreach)
First-generation and rural students (in admissions or access initiatives)
Community stakeholders (in civic partnerships or institutional planning)
Broad student populations (in student services or advising)
Cross-cultural audiences (in public programming or communications)

These substitutes support inclusive engagement while avoiding ideological interpretations.

When It May Still Be Appropriate

“Diverse communities” may still be appropriate in federal grants, accreditation materials, or academic disciplines such as public health, education, or social work where the term is defined and supported by research. It may also be used when describing geographic or economic variation, provided it is not linked to demographic preferences. Avoid using the phrase in standing policies, hiring criteria, or promotional materials unless accompanied by clear, mission-driven definitions.

NOTES: Frame engagement with communities in terms of service, access, and institutional responsibility—not identity alignment. Use data and geographic specificity where possible to avoid assumptions or political misinterpretation. Always align language with applicable state laws and institutional policy guidance.