TERM: intersex
RISK LEVEL: high
Definition
“Intersex” refers to individuals born with physical sex characteristics—such as chromosomes, hormones, or anatomy—that do not fit typical definitions of male or female. In higher education, the term is most often used in health education, biology curricula, nondiscrimination statements, and student identity resources.
Why It’s Risky
“Intersex” is considered high-risk in politically regulated environments where laws restrict references to gender identity, sexual orientation, or non-binary classifications, including Florida’s Stop W.O.K.E. Act and Texas Education Code Chapter 51, Subchapter Z. Though medically recognized, the term is increasingly viewed by critics as part of a broader push to normalize contested understandings of sex and gender in education. When included in diversity statements, housing policies, or campus communications, “intersex” may be interpreted as advancing a progressive view of biological variation that conflicts with policies defining sex strictly as male or female. Institutions referencing “intersex” in policy documents or official training materials may face criticism from legislators, trustees, or political advocacy groups for promoting nontraditional views of sex, especially in K-12 partnerships or public-facing materials.
Common Critiques
Critics argue that inclusion of “intersex” in official documents reflects an alignment with activist-driven frameworks that challenge biologically based definitions of sex. They contend that it introduces unnecessary complexity and controversy into education policy and public discourse. In conservative-led states, legislators have warned that acknowledging intersex status in housing policies, admissions forms, or student services promotes gender ideology that conflicts with state law or parental rights. Others argue that intersex inclusion is often symbolic, serving to signal ideological commitments rather than address widespread student needs. Some trustees and donors express concern that references to intersex identities may alienate constituents who hold traditional or religious views on sex and gender. Even when medically accurate, critics claim the term’s presence in public university documents may imply endorsement of broader gender theory, increasing the institution’s exposure to public and political backlash.
Suggested Substitutes
Support for all students regardless of sex or background (in policy language);
Health services that address individual medical needs (in wellness programming);
Respect for privacy and dignity in campus housing (in housing policies);
Focus on fairness and inclusion under applicable law (in compliance statements);
Use of medically accurate and legally recognized terms (in academic contexts)
These alternatives provide support and professionalism without invoking politically sensitive identity categories.
When It May Still Be Appropriate
“Intersex” may be appropriate in medical education, biology coursework, or academic research where the term is scientifically relevant and defined. It may also be required in federal compliance statements that reference sex characteristics or in grant-funded health initiatives. In broader institutional communications, use neutral and legally grounded terms unless intersex inclusion is specifically required.
NOTES: Avoid using “intersex” in general policy language, public-facing materials, or training documents unless justified by academic relevance or federal compliance. Focus on neutrality, privacy, and student support within existing legal frameworks to minimize risk.
Resources on Other Sites
- Suggestion? Leave me a note in the comment field below.
Modification History File Created: 04/25/2025 Last Modified: 04/25/2025
This work is licensed under an Open Educational Resource-Quality Master Source (OER-QMS) License.