most risk | Campus Safe Words

TERM: most risk
RISK LEVEL: High

Definition

The phrase “most risk” is often used in academic and administrative contexts to describe individuals or groups believed to be more susceptible to negative outcomes, such as academic failure, health issues, or social marginalization. In higher education, it may appear in student support materials, program descriptions, or funding proposals referencing populations deemed vulnerable due to socioeconomic, racial, or psychological factors.

Why It’s Risky

The term “most risk” can raise concerns when it implicitly categorizes individuals by group identity rather than individual behavior or circumstance. In politically conservative states, language that frames entire student populations—especially along racial or ethnic lines—as inherently at risk may be seen as advancing identity-based narratives that conflict with principles of individual responsibility and equality under the law. Critics may argue that such language aligns with progressive ideologies that attribute disparities to systemic oppression rather than personal agency.

When paired with DEI initiatives or trauma-informed language, “most risk” may be interpreted as promoting a worldview that assigns blame to institutions or historical injustices rather than fostering resilience or merit-based achievement. Legislative efforts like Florida’s Stop W.O.K.E. Act or Texas SB 17 have created environments where language that suggests inherited disadvantage, especially tied to race or identity, can trigger scrutiny or even legal review.

Common Critiques

One prominent critique is that the phrase “most risk” lacks precision and encourages broad generalizations about certain groups, often based on race, income, or immigration status. Conservative policymakers argue that this approach reinforces a victim mindset and erodes the foundational belief that all individuals have equal capacity to succeed regardless of background. In their view, risk assessments should be based on individual metrics—such as academic performance, attendance, or financial need—rather than sociopolitical categories.

Use of “most risk” can also imply that institutions have an obligation to disproportionately allocate resources or alter academic standards to accommodate certain populations. Critics argue this approach not only misallocates limited resources but also creates a two-tier system that may lower expectations and reduce rigor for the students it aims to help.

Additionally, the phrase can be viewed as a rhetorical gateway to programs that prioritize racial or ideological equity over race-neutral policies. When used in grant applications, program goals, or campus communications, it may be read as an indirect appeal for differential treatment—particularly problematic under new laws barring preferential programs based on race, gender, or identity.

Acceptable Alternatives

1. Students facing significant academic or financial challenges

2. At-risk students (when defined by clear metrics)

3. Students in need of additional support

4. Students experiencing barriers to success

5. Individuals in challenging circumstances

When It’s Still Appropriate

“Most risk” may still be appropriate in statistical or research-based contexts, such as public health studies or educational assessments, where the criteria for risk are clearly defined and measurable. It can also be used in federally funded reports or compliance documents that rely on established risk categories tied to data rather than identity. However, even in these cases, terms should be used with care and specificity.

Notes:

Avoid using “most risk” as a catch-all phrase in program descriptions, public messaging, or strategic plans. When necessary, define the criteria for risk clearly and base them on observable, individual-level factors rather than group identity. Emphasize personal agency, academic resilience, and support services open to all students.